My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
110315
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 9 -16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2015 3:38:00 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS 9-16
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
270
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler stated that as he is hearing Mr. Dolan, there are other factors that <br /> are more important to whether the road gets built than whether or not a precedent <br /> happens. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that he would not say they are important, but they probably have more <br /> influence on whether or not it happens. <br /> Commissioner Nagler asked if his understanding is correct that the Option 3 <br /> recommendation of having 10 homes basically go in one direction and 40 go in another <br /> is because 10 is the number that is exempt from Measure PP. <br /> Mr. Dolan said yes; that is the base or starting point for the conversation, and it seemed <br /> reasonable. <br /> Commissioner Nagler noted that if a policy decision were made by the Council or the <br /> developer to divide the project and create two entrances, it could be a different number <br /> than 10. <br /> Mr. Dolan confirmed that it could. <br /> Commissioner Piper stated that this obviously is such a difficult topic and certainly one <br /> of the most difficult since she has been on the Planning Commission. She thanked the <br /> applicants for their patience and their contribution to the City, and acknowledged that <br /> Greenbriar Homes does build beautiful products. She indicated that there are two <br /> things she wants to talk about: <br /> 1. A huge portion of this is definitely emotional. From purely a standpoint of <br /> emotion and not taking into consideration Measure PP or the environmental <br /> impacts or the intent of the voters and the drafters of Measure PP and all of that, <br /> she would conclude that the access should be on the side of Sycamore Creek <br /> Way. That neighborhood knew that this was coming; there was a road there, <br /> there was signage there, it shows in the CC&Rs, and it was disclosed by the <br /> builders. These neighbors moved into that neighborhood knowing full well that at <br /> some point there would be access to another neighborhood. It is sad that both <br /> neighborhoods could potentially be burdened by traffic, particularly the Junipero <br /> Street side in that neighborhood because they continue to take the burden of <br /> more and more traffic, and that is not right. <br /> Commissioner Piper indicated that she has been a Pleasanton resident for <br /> 40 years and knows that neighborhood well; she knows what has gone on in <br /> these last few years, particularly with commute patterns and the people who are <br /> driving from Pleasanton to the South Bay through Independence Drive to try to <br /> get through some of that traffic on Sunol Boulevard. Ms. LaBarge's comment <br /> was the most heartfelt because she is really truly dealing with this as a resident <br /> on that street. <br /> 2. From the standpoint of if a road is a structure or not, the environmental impacts, <br /> Measure PP, and what she personally believes the intent was of the drafters and <br /> the voters of Measure PP, Commissioner Piper stated that her belief is that a <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, June 24, 2015 Page 32 of 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.