My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081815
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
CCMIN081815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2015 12:54:17 PM
Creation date
10/14/2015 12:54:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/18/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Steven Meyers, Hummingbird Lane, said that any comments hinting at racial prejudice among the <br /> Birdland community are both disgusting and undignified. Setting aside the issue of privacy, he <br /> concurred with Commissioner Piper's comments that the design of rear-facing balconies simply does <br /> not fit with the Monterey colonial style homes found within Birdland. He said he personally found the <br /> proposed dormers to be garish and overbuilt but that he could accept them in the spirit of being a good <br /> neighbor. He empathized with the Cummings, noting that he has 2 rear facing neighbors with reverse <br /> pie-shaped lots. If they were to have something similar to the proposed balcony, his neighbors would <br /> have an unhindered view into his rear yard and home. He asked the Council to uphold the Planning <br /> Commission's action. <br /> Vice Mayor Brown asked if he felt there was any relationship between rear yard privacy conditions and <br /> the home one selects to purchase. <br /> Mr. Meyers said "yes," though admitted he would not run around his backyard in the nude. If his rear <br /> neighbors had such balconies, he might have felt differently about wanting to own his home. <br /> Michael Smith, Hummingbird Lane, said he felt the design of the proposed project was completely out <br /> of character with the surrounding neighborhood. More importantly, the proposed balcony would <br /> negatively affect neighbors' privacy and the resulting precedent could potentially affect the entire <br /> neighborhood in a similar manner. He asked the Council to uphold the Planning Commission's ruling. <br /> Don Hague stated that he is the applicant's neighbor on the opposite side of the Cummings. He <br /> explained that he has no objection to the scope of the project with exception of the balcony, which he <br /> said serves no purpose other than to infringe on neighbors' privacy. He said that the photos presented <br /> by the applicant show views from the first floor, which vegetation will obviously obscure, and do not <br /> address view impacts resulting from the proposed balcony. He said he also has concerns with project <br /> construction, specifically the lack of plan to address the staging of materials, dumpster parking and <br /> construction vehicle parking and would really like to know what to expect as this moves forward. <br /> Vice Mayor Brown asked Mr. Otto to address Mr. Hague's concerns. <br /> Mr. Otto explained that the actual staging of a residential addition is not something that staff would <br /> normally review. Typically, dumpsters will be parked in the driveway or an encroachment permit is <br /> obtained to allow its temporary location on the street. <br /> Shelby Ferrari explained that she moved from Burlingame to her home on Hummingbird Lane 5 years <br /> ago. She acknowledged the right and desire to make improvements to the older homes that make up <br /> Birdland but said that any improvements should be done with a conscientious eye towards the potential <br /> impact on neighbors. She said her own young girls play in the Cummings' backyard and she agreed <br /> that privacy is a major concern with the proposed project. She said the Cummings have already made <br /> significant compromises by not disputing such a sizable residential addition and related construction <br /> impacts. With that mind, it seems quite reasonable that the applicant could compromise the balcony. <br /> Mr. Ferrari said that while he thinks the proposed project is beautiful the right of privacy, even <br /> subjectively, should take priority over architecture and aesthetic beauty. He stated his support for the <br /> Planning Commission's decision. <br /> Wahida Noorzad, the applicant's sister, questioned how important privacy truly is to the Cummings and <br /> other neighbors. She said that when visiting the applicants' home, it is very common for the Cummings <br /> to enjoy their evenings with their windows and curtains open and interior lights on despite the fact that <br /> one can then easily see them moving about their home. Furthermore, the applicants already have an <br /> unobstructed view of the Cummings' property and the balcony will make no material difference. She <br /> also questioned the statements about being a good neighbor, stating that her sister has been <br /> intentionally excluded from neighborhood activities and told to sell her home. She said she was present <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 14 August 18,2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.