My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
100615
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/7/2015 12:23:51 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 12:47:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/6/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Velio A. "AI" Bronzini BUP�'l ENYENTAL hV1ATERlAL <br /> 719 Main St. Provided to the City Council <br /> Pleasanton, CA 94566 After Distribution of Packet <br /> October 1, 2015 Date f j � <br /> Open letter to the members of the Pleasanton City Council from Al Bronzini, property <br /> owner of 719 Main Street. <br /> Dear members of the Council: <br /> I have owned my property on Main Street since 1983 and I am not surprised at the results <br /> of the HEXAGON PARKING SURVEY REPORT, dated September 23, 2013. Parking, or the <br /> lack thereof, has been a topic of discussion ever since the reconstruction of Main Street <br /> over twenty years ago. <br /> Many very good projects have come to Downtown since the Main Street project was <br /> completed, yet the subject of providing additional parking has never been top priority. <br /> There have been many committees and discussions, but never any leadership from the <br /> City to move the issue of parking forward. The City of Pleasanton holds the purse strings <br /> and it is the responsibility of the City to get serious now about Downtown parking. The <br /> situation is critical to the continued growth and prosperity of the Downtown area. <br /> I read from the Hexagon Parking Survey and that upon the completion of the Pastime <br /> Plaza Project there will be no parking spaces within two blocks of the Main/Rose-Neal <br /> intersection. The survey also states that a need for 23 or more new parking spaces will be <br /> needed upon completion of the project. I also read that the parking fees for that <br /> project were waived in exchange for a 666 sq. ft. Plaza on the property which looks to be <br /> no more than a small patio entrance to the businesses in that building. If that is what the <br /> Planners wanted then the developer should have been required to make it be part of the <br /> plan, not a trade for the parking fees. <br /> I see no rational why the City agreed to gift away in lieu fees for 23 parking spaces at <br /> what I understand to be approximately $18,000.00 per space for that small patio with a <br /> few tables and chairs. With that kind of loose money management we will always be <br /> playing catch up with regard to Downtown parking. Waiving such huge amounts of money <br /> in that manner is poor management. The Downtown businesses got the short end of the <br /> stick on that deal. <br /> You cannot continue to punt the parking issue to the next administration. The time to act <br /> is now. I support the recommendations of the Pleasanton Downtown Association and I ask <br /> that you take a pro-active approach regarding the Downtown parking situation. We, the <br /> property owners, need your leadership on this matter and we need it now. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Velio A. "Al" Bronzini <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.