Laserfiche WebLink
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> Provided to the Uity uouncu <br /> Subject: FW: Ponderosa After Distribution of Packet <br /> From: Matt Sullivan [mailto: <br /> Date OCT 0 6 2On <br /> Sent:Tuesday, October 06, 2015 4:23 PM <br /> To: Ellen Holmgren <br /> Cc: Mayor and City Council; Nelson Fialho; Gerry Beaudin; Adam Weinstein; Jenny Soo; Maria Hoey; Pleasanton City <br /> Clerk <br /> Subject: Re: Ponderosa <br /> Mr. Mayor, <br /> A couple of key points you glossed over that others may be unaware of from this form letter: <br /> • The original approval was a negotiated agreement between Ponderosa(and their lobbyist Mark <br /> Sweeney), the Council, and the neighbors meant to overcome the earlier referended project. Because <br /> they "weren't able to build out their master plan" is not rational for reneging on that agreement. If the <br /> original agreement made Ponderosa whole from a profit standpoint, adding new houses now is just a <br /> windfall for them. <br /> • You failed to mention that Ponderosa built houses on the school site several years ago under a similar <br /> situation as this. <br /> • Your statement about growth management seems to insinuate that we need to build 235 houses per year <br /> for 8 years to stay in compliance with RHNA. You know well that this is not the case -but it sounds <br /> good as a rational. <br /> I hope you actually read my email and take the issues I raise into consideration. <br /> Thanks <br /> Matt Sullivan <br /> i <br />