My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
20
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
100615
>
20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2015 11:42:54 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 11:42:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/6/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC COMMENT & NOTICE <br /> Notices regarding the City Council public hearing were mailed to the surrounding <br /> property owners and tenants within a 1,000-foot radius of the project site. Staff received <br /> 13 emails from the public, the vast majority of which opposed the project due to <br /> concerns related to drought, traffic, school capacity, and other issues related to growth. <br /> OTHER PUBLIC BENEFITS <br /> In addition to the applicable fees and requirements, the applicant has offered <br /> community benefits, including providing $1,000 per lot ($25,000 total based on the <br /> proposed site plan), which can be used for public purposes such as implementation of <br /> projects identified in the City's Park and Recreation Master Plan. The applicant has also <br /> agreed to repaint the sound wall on Valley Avenue located between Busch Road and <br /> Santa Rita Road. These additional items, which have been offered by the applicant, <br /> have been included in the project conditions of approval. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> An Initial Study/Negative Declaration has been prepared for the proposed project. <br /> Based on the Initial Study, which analyzed the previously-proposed 27-unit residential <br /> project, staff believes that the project would not have any significant environmental <br /> impacts. Staff, therefore, believes that the Initial Study/Negative Declaration is the <br /> appropriate environmental document for review of the project and is in conformance <br /> with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the City Council concurs with <br /> this environmental assessment, it must make the finding that the Initial Study/Negative <br /> Declaration adequately evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the project <br /> prior to taking action on the project. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> The applicant has revised the proposed project in response to the Planning <br /> Commission's comments, resulting in overall improvements to the streetscape, onsite <br /> amenity and open space areas, and overall project cohesiveness. Specifically, the <br /> applicant reduced the number of residential units from 27 to 25 and added an 11,000- <br /> square-foot passive recreational area that could be used by project residents and the <br /> general public. The applicant also increased the number of parking stalls designated for <br /> use by Gardens residents from 13 to 22 (including six spaces limited to evening and <br /> weekend use), helping meet parking demand at the Gardens. Staff finds that the <br /> proposed revisions would improve the overall development and benefit the residents as <br /> well as the public. <br /> Page 11 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.