My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
100615
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2015 3:51:06 PM
Creation date
9/29/2015 3:51:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/6/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Put a price on downtown parking. <br /> Given the competitive position of downtown merchants, competing with nearby <br /> downtowns with free parking, and suburban shopping centers, metered parking at this <br /> time would just undercut downtown's competitiveness. <br /> 5. Expanded use of parking in lieu fees. <br /> As with the parking garage, this strategy could be pursued in the longer term, but <br /> cannot solve the immediate problem. <br /> Before in lieu fees could work, the City would have to get ahead of the parking demand <br /> —this approach would not work while the City is playing catch up to parking saturation. <br /> But, once reasonable parking supply relative to parking demand is established, growth <br /> of downtown building space and vitality could provide at least 2/3 of the funding for <br /> increased parking demand, allowing the City to leverage its parking investments by a <br /> factor of three, or more. <br /> Public parking spaces are inherently more efficient, supporting more square footage of <br /> new development than private parking lots, because public spaces get used all day <br /> long, not just at the peak time of one private business. The Weinberger-Karlin Resnick <br /> Study states that"given different time of day peaking characteristics of different land <br /> uses, sharing parking allows mixed-use districts to provide the same effective parking <br /> supply using approximately 2/3 the number of stalls that would be programmed without <br /> sharing spaces" (1). <br /> Moreover, suburban parking standards, such as one parking space per 300 sq. ft. of <br /> building space, have not worked well in downtown settings. In order to build or expand <br /> building space, small lot sizes make the on-site parking configurations unworkable. So, <br /> in order to meet the suburban parking standards designed for single business peak <br /> periods, developers often have to buy the lot next door, and tear down buildings, <br /> creating gaps not conducive to downtown design and pedestrian shopping. There are <br /> numerous downtown properties (in addition to the Pastime Pool property) which would <br /> add building space but for the requirement to provide on-site parking. <br /> The primary benefit of expanded use of in lieu fees would be expanded vitality in the <br /> downtown. Greater intensity creates better proximity and a pedestrian environment. <br /> For example, with the Spring Street lot, those 42 parking spaces (at 300 sq. ft. per <br /> space) could allow 12,600 sq. ft. in increased building space, while reducing parking <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.