My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN072115
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
CCMIN072115
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2015 3:14:55 PM
Creation date
8/24/2015 3:14:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/21/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and equitable rates be established across all customer classifications. Additional guidelines and <br /> parameters include encouraging water conservation, maintaining senior and low income discounts to <br /> the degree that is fiscally possible, designing rates to maintain reserves throughout drought periods and <br /> identifying funding for the city's recycled water program. The city hired HDR Engineering to prepare a <br /> rate study based on these parameters. This effort was complimented by regular meetings of the Audit <br /> Committee, comprised of Councilmember Olson, Vice Mayor Brown and staff, to review the rates and <br /> consider all possible alternatives. <br /> The rate study concluded that Pleasanton has billed customers for approximately 87.5% of the cost <br /> water purchased from Zone 7, and that the city can no longer absorb this cost and must instead pass <br /> 100% of the cost of wholesale water rates to its customers. The study concluded that the city needs to <br /> repair and replacement of its infrastructure through its rates in an amount equal to annual depreciation, <br /> although it should be noted that is not achieved in this study. The study further concluded that drought <br /> rates, which differ from drought penalties, must be established to maintain reserves and financial <br /> stability during a drought and that recycled water rates are needed to fund the cost of operations of the <br /> newly established recycled water enterprise. <br /> On October 6, 2015 the City Council will consider water and sewer rate proposals that will accomplish <br /> the following: <br /> • A proposed increase of 6.7% to water rates, effective October 15, 2015 with certain components <br /> of the rate structure increasing annually by the CPI adjustment beginning January 1, 2016; <br /> • Implementation of recycled water rates, proposed to be equal to 90% of potable irrigation rates <br /> and increasing annually accordingly; <br /> • A proposed increase of 3% to sewer rates, effective October 15, 2015 and increasing annually <br /> by the CPI adjustment beginning July 1, 2016 <br /> Ms. Wagner presented several slides reviewing the proposed water rate increases, noting again the <br /> recommendation to pass through 100% of Zone 7 rates as well as an increase to fund repair and <br /> replacement in an amount equal to annual depreciation. The distribution charges within each rate would <br /> be subject to the annual CPI increase and Zone 7 rates would increase as appropriate based on rate <br /> adjustments initiated by Zone 7. All single-family residential rate tiers are proposed to increase by 30 <br /> cents per one hundred cubic feet (CCF) with exception of Tier 2, to which staff has proposed applying <br /> an additional 10 cent per CCF recycled water surcharge. Commercial, multi-family and potable <br /> irrigation accounts would also increase 30 cents per CCF. She briefly reviewed the potential impact to <br /> consumers based on current low, moderate and high usage categories, noting that the national average <br /> for bi-monthly use is 23 CCF. <br /> She introduced the proposed drought rates, which would not go into effect without separate and <br /> additional action by the Council. She explained that the rate surcharge is intended to maintain financial <br /> stability when conservation reduces consumption to the point that infrastructure reserves are <br /> threatened. She also explained that due to the assumed conservation, the additional rate would have a <br /> very minimal impact on ratepayers' bill. Reviewing single-family residential examples at low <br /> consumption and the required conservation levels, she demonstrated how the surcharge from Stages 1 <br /> through 4 would increase a user's bill anywhere from 70 cents to $6. She stressed again that while the <br /> overall rate structure would take effect October 15, 2015 if adopted by the Council, these rates would <br /> not go into effect without special action by the Council following a recommendation by staff. <br /> Mayor Thorne stressed that tonight's requested action is simply to authorize staff mail the Proposition <br /> 218 notice. No action to change rates will be taken tonight. <br /> Vice Mayor Brown asked why, assuming that a drought situation results in conservation and therefore <br /> less water is purchased while fixed costs remain steady, a user's bill would increase. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 8 of 17 July 21, 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.