16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Luchini responded that the approval letter would have to be revised to remove the balcony entirely in order for that scenario to work. Ms. Kiziloglu replied she does not agree. Ms. Kiziloglu explained the conditions of approval for the balcony are to address the vegetation requirements and not the balcony itself; therefore the balcony would be approved either way and so it should remain in the approval letter. Mr. Luchini stated the language would have to be added to the Zoning Administrator's approval today and not continued to a later date. Mr. Weinstein responded he could add the language today that the balcony be subject to the approval of both the applicant and appellant. Mr. Luchini agreed the language could be added today; and he explained that the applicant and appellant would both have the opportunity to appeal the decision to the Planning Commission if they were not satisfied with the conditions of approval crafted after today's hearing. Mr. Weinstein responded he is in favor of this solution. Mr. Luchini asked that the City Attorney be consulted after the meeting to be sure the conditions set forth in the approval letter are acceptable. Mr. Weinstein asked if there were any closing comments from the applicant or appellant. (No comments were made). The Public Hearing was closed. The Zoning Administrator granted approval of P15-0037, subject to the condition that Staff will craft a new condition of approval that relates to the creation of a vegetative barrier with performance measures that specify minimum and maximum tree height, density of trees, degree of transparency, long-term maintenance, and a replacement of the fence; and that the conditions be sent to both the applicant and appellant for approval at which time, if both parties agree, the condition would be imposed. As there was no further business, the Zoning Administrator adjourned the meeting at 10:45 a.m. Respe ily submitted, Eric Lug mi • Associia Planner P15-0037, Zarina Kiziloglu, March 10, 2015