Laserfiche WebLink
group of people on the block and they would come if 1 requested. <br /> I want to make it clear, I am removing all consideration of accepting a balcony under any <br /> terms. I am already going to deal with month and months of noise from the major <br /> reconstruction. I am a very busy person and had to take time away from work which caused <br /> considerable stress with my manager. I am starting to feel uneasy about the addition as a <br /> whole and what a burden it places on my family, personal and professional life. I have lived <br /> here 9 years and this is our second purchased home in Pleasanton. My in-laws and I own four <br /> homes in Pleasanton and they have all resided here for 35 years. Three of them worked for the <br /> School district and my father in law volunteers daily at Walnut Grove doing campus security <br /> because my daughters and 2 nephews attend there. We are entrenched in this city because it <br /> cares for it's citizens. <br /> Your department seems to be more concerned about someone who has moved from Folsom in <br /> the last few months and wants to make a 3500 sq./ft monstrosity of a house in a neighborhood <br /> of 1900-2800 sq./ft homes. It does not seem right to continue to push this in light of my listed <br /> concerns. I felt supportive of this virtual mansion sized home by agreeing to all of the square <br /> footage, even though it will be an outlier property on the block and the entire neighborhood. <br /> I hope I have made my intentions clear, I would appreciate an immediate denial of the request <br /> to permit a balcony and a waiver(if necessary) of the fee to appeal because I DID NOT <br /> AGREE TO ANYTHING at the hearing on March 10th. <br /> Best regards, <br /> Jamison Cummings <br /> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Eric Luchini <El.uchinincityofpleasantonca.gov> wrote: <br /> Hello Zarina and Jamison: <br /> Thank you again for your attendance and contributions at the 3/10/15 ZA hearing. Pursuant <br /> to that meeting, please find attached the following: <br /> 1. Revised Conditions of Approval; <br /> 2. Restrictive Covenant; and <br /> 3. Exhibit A to the Restrictive Covenant. <br /> Based on further evaluation of the plans and a site visit, the Zoning Administrator and staff <br /> feels this plan adequately addresses the privacy concerns raised at the ZA hearing on <br /> 3/10/15. The intent of maintaining the existing Mulberry Tree and planting the new and <br /> evergreen Camphor Tree is to provide full screening of the swimming pool and rear yard <br /> area from the subject addition and balcony. Additionally, given the starting and ultimate <br />