My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
081815
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:40:25 AM
Creation date
8/11/2015 4:04:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/18/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
group of people on the block and they would come if 1 requested. <br /> I want to make it clear, I am removing all consideration of accepting a balcony under any <br /> terms. I am already going to deal with month and months of noise from the major <br /> reconstruction. I am a very busy person and had to take time away from work which caused <br /> considerable stress with my manager. I am starting to feel uneasy about the addition as a <br /> whole and what a burden it places on my family, personal and professional life. I have lived <br /> here 9 years and this is our second purchased home in Pleasanton. My in-laws and I own four <br /> homes in Pleasanton and they have all resided here for 35 years. Three of them worked for the <br /> School district and my father in law volunteers daily at Walnut Grove doing campus security <br /> because my daughters and 2 nephews attend there. We are entrenched in this city because it <br /> cares for it's citizens. <br /> Your department seems to be more concerned about someone who has moved from Folsom in <br /> the last few months and wants to make a 3500 sq./ft monstrosity of a house in a neighborhood <br /> of 1900-2800 sq./ft homes. It does not seem right to continue to push this in light of my listed <br /> concerns. I felt supportive of this virtual mansion sized home by agreeing to all of the square <br /> footage, even though it will be an outlier property on the block and the entire neighborhood. <br /> I hope I have made my intentions clear, I would appreciate an immediate denial of the request <br /> to permit a balcony and a waiver(if necessary) of the fee to appeal because I DID NOT <br /> AGREE TO ANYTHING at the hearing on March 10th. <br /> Best regards, <br /> Jamison Cummings <br /> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Eric Luchini <El.uchinincityofpleasantonca.gov> wrote: <br /> Hello Zarina and Jamison: <br /> Thank you again for your attendance and contributions at the 3/10/15 ZA hearing. Pursuant <br /> to that meeting, please find attached the following: <br /> 1. Revised Conditions of Approval; <br /> 2. Restrictive Covenant; and <br /> 3. Exhibit A to the Restrictive Covenant. <br /> Based on further evaluation of the plans and a site visit, the Zoning Administrator and staff <br /> feels this plan adequately addresses the privacy concerns raised at the ZA hearing on <br /> 3/10/15. The intent of maintaining the existing Mulberry Tree and planting the new and <br /> evergreen Camphor Tree is to provide full screening of the swimming pool and rear yard <br /> area from the subject addition and balcony. Additionally, given the starting and ultimate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.