Laserfiche WebLink
Fi•ure 3: View into appellants' and from an existin! u•stairs bedroom on the sub'ect sarcel <br /> ,• t ' r <br /> , 1 <br /> �` �i r <br /> \ - V�, l J' yam. <br /> �^ 4• <br /> '.4 ..*.1 .1 'fit a* ' .rte 1,..• . <br /> ::/1(..,..,.../ ...A11:. .."■-.'. lif . ' . •.;-, , ' ,___ - ' <br /> : :f <br /> Fi.ure 4: Birds e e view of the subect site and the existin• Mulbe tree with full folia!e <br /> _ - = I--_..._ <br /> '- w t i <br /> �4 I ,yy <br /> 1111 . <br /> t '' <br /> _ -.I: <br /> Appe #ants' Bedroom and <br /> J, ' Swimmina 12....4 Area . / u^ <br /> As seen in Figure 5 below, the proposed second-floor balcony is proposed in an area roughly <br /> parallel to the existing mulberry tree (projecting approximately nine-and-one-half-feet into the <br /> rear yard from the existing second-story wall of the residence), meaning any direct lines of <br /> sight toward the appellants' bedroom windows would most likely be fully screened when the <br /> tree has full foliage and partially screened when the tree doesn't have its leaves. It should also <br /> be noted that the appellants' bay tree and freestanding pergola would further serve to screen <br /> views to the bedroom from the proposed second-floor balcony. However, the proposed <br /> P15-0037, Kiziloglu Addition Planning Commission <br /> 7 of 11 <br />