My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
081815
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:40:25 AM
Creation date
8/11/2015 4:04:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/18/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Piper stated that if the Commission wants to go to the direction of having <br /> the neighbors work it out, it should ask the applicant and the appellant if that is <br /> agreeable to them because based on everything she has read, she did not think there is <br /> any room for that. <br /> Acting Chair Ritter agreed that he gets that idea too. He asked if making the room a <br /> little bigger and getting rid of the balcony is something that can be worked out. <br /> Commissioner Balch stated that he has gone down this road before, and the <br /> Commission can go a long way and get to the same exact spot. He recommended that <br /> the Commission either immediately continue the item or immediately make a motion <br /> and vote or informally say where each one sits so the Commission knows where it <br /> stands. <br /> Acting Chair Ritter moved to deny the appeal and uphold the Zoning <br /> Administrator's approval of Case P15-0037. <br /> Commissioners Piper and Balch stated that they did understand the motion since Acting <br /> Chair Ritter had indicated earlier that he did not want the balcony. <br /> Ms. Harryman asked Acting Chair Ritter if he is in favor of the balcony. <br /> Acting Chair Ritter said no, and moved to uphold the appeal of Case P15-0037, <br /> thereby overturning the Zoning Administrator's approval. <br /> Commissioner Piper inquired if that allows the applicant to build everything minus the <br /> balcony. <br /> Acting Chair Ritter indicated that he wants the applicant to be able to build everything <br /> minus the balcony. He asked Ms. Harryman how he could make that motion. <br /> Ms. Harryman explained that the appeal is to overturn the Zoning Administrator's <br /> decision, but the Commission is looking at it fresh now. She indicated that the <br /> Commission can uphold the Zoning Administrator's decision, or it can reject the Zoning <br /> Administrator's decision, or it can modify the Zoning Administrator's decision. She <br /> stated that what she is hearing in Acting Chair Ritter's motion is that he is fine with <br /> everything except the balcony. <br /> Acting Chair Ritter confirmed that was correct. <br /> Commissioner Balch clarified that it is to approve the building without a balcony. <br /> Ms. Harryman confirmed that interpretation. <br /> Commissioner Piper seconded the motion. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 27, 2015 Page 12 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.