16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Cummings replied that none of them worked because, if for some reason, he missed something, the balcony cannot be undone. He stated that it is really a matter of avoiding this problem altogether. He noted that it sets a bad precedent for other neighbors to have the ability to build a rear-facing balcony on another house and create an additional amount of City workload to solve this problem for somebody else. He added that it would not be consistent with what the residents are used to in the Birdland neighborhood. Commissioner Nagler stated that it is possible to say in theory that something may be unanticipated and, therefore, what was intended to have happen does not in fact happen; and major buildings are engineered on paper with calculations, and one could say the calculation could be wrong but the building gets built. He added that he does not candidly know, from his perspective, if simply saying "it may not be what it looks to be or what it is intended to be is the sole objection" is reasonable, as opposed to saying it is not adequate for these specific reasons. Mr. Cummings replied that engineering is an exact science and is typically black and white with calculations that can be compensated; but this is about trees that are organic and do what they want. He reiterated that a fence can be fixed in one day but a tree cannot be fixed. Commissioner Nagler agreed that not all proposed solutions are trees, and that was why he was asking if there is no solution, no matter how; that from his point of view, a solid stucco wall is not a solution. Mr. Cummings replied that he does not feel comfortable with any kind of architecture that facilitates people lingering in their backyards where they can look into his backyard. Acting Chair Ritter noted that in one of the slides, the windows of the house are changing slightly, although they would result in views similar to existing ones. Mr. Cummings stated that he is uneasy with the whole construction but he is making a compromise with that. He added that he feels he is being reasonable by objecting to just this one balcony. Gustavo Francken, neighbor, stated that he and his wife received the letter a month or two ago, and they came down and took a look at the plans. He indicated that they do not really have any issues with all the upgrades and thinks it will be really good in general. He noted that they also did a remodel about a year-and-a-half ago on their house and took about five months to complete. He further noted that it is extremely expensive to remodel and wanted to know how long and how intrusive on the neighborhood that would be. Mr. Francken stated that he has no real issues at all with the plans except for the balcony in the back. He indicated that they have a two-story Monterey-style house and EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, May 27, 2015 Page 4 of 14