My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060215
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
CCMIN060215
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2015 3:12:45 PM
Creation date
7/29/2015 3:12:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/2/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
his legal options and understands that the Council is his final option for administrative appeal. He argued that the <br /> city's definition of median home size differs significantly from what exists within Golden Eagle, which has a <br /> median size of 5,500 square feet. <br /> Mr. Dommer explained that it makes little sense to count the covered porch as part of the structure's mass when it <br /> accounts for only 15 of the home's 110-foot width. He also explained that pushing the second story back could be <br /> accommodated with a covered porch, which would not require additional grading, rather than increasing the first <br /> floor footprint. <br /> Mayor Thorne closed the public hearing. <br /> Councilmember Narum asked staff to comment on the Design Guidelines being codified. <br /> Mr. Weinstein explained that the Design Guidelines were adopted by the city and that its language is very clear in <br /> terms of the Guidelines being used to guide development in the area. However, the rules regarding second story <br /> setbacks and grading are not prescriptive, as is made very clear by the language of the Guidelines. While these <br /> specific elements were adopted by the city their implementation is inherently flexibility. The document's <br /> introduction states that the Guidelines "are not meant to be a coverall document but rather to provide preliminary <br /> information and data that will assist the owner and his agents in initial decision making." The langauge regarding • <br /> grading indicates that grading should not exceed 40% of the lot area or 20,000 square feet, whichever is smaller, <br /> without approval of the city and HOA. This clearly suggests that additional grading could be allowed on the site <br /> with the proper approval. The second story setback language for this particular lot says that the design should <br /> produce a home that is horizontal in character and does not accentuate vertical features. This langauge does not <br /> necessarily preclude a second story but does require some design creativity. These are all indications that the <br /> Guidelines are fairly flexible and not prescriptive in terms of resulting in a specific design. <br /> Councilmember Olson said it is unfortunate that Mr. Monzo was held to certain standards that now appear to be <br /> relaxed and he felt that some additional resdesign was warranted to improve the impacts to the appellant. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Brown to waive full reading and adopt Resolution No. 15-760 denying the appeal <br /> of Gary Monzo thereby upholding the Planning Commission decision for Design Review approval to construct an <br /> approxmately 6,841-square-foot two-story custom home and related landscape and site improvements including <br /> approximately 23,817 square feet of grading for 8019 Golden Eagle Way as filed under Case No. P14-1186; and <br /> approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Growth Management agreement with Nagib Haddad. <br /> Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thome <br /> NOES: Councilmember Olson <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> BREAK: Mayor Thome called a brief recess and thereafter reconvened the regular meeting. <br /> 25. Drought Update regarding California Emergency Declaration and Stage 3 Mandatory Reductions <br /> Director of Operations Services Smith presented the update and recommendation to continue the local <br /> Emergency Declaration and Stage 3 Mandatory Reductions. He provided a year to year comparison of the city's <br /> progress with respect to its conservation goal of 25%. In May 2015, the community reduced its consumption by <br /> 46% over the same period in 2013, which is almost double what was achieved in 2014 (28%). Year-to-date the <br /> city has conserved 31.4% (622 million gallons) over 2013, which is again almost double its progress at this same <br /> time last year (16.2%). In the first 4 months of 2015 city facilities have reduced consumption by 17.8 million <br /> gallons, or 33.3% over 2013. <br /> Mr. Smith reminded the Council and public that the state is still in severe drought conditions and stressed the <br /> importance of continued conservation. He reviewed reservoir levels throughout the state, focusing on Lake <br /> Oroville which is at its second greatest low point although the population has doubled since its last historic low. <br /> He also noted that for the first time in history Lake Tahoe levels have not recovered with the snow melt. <br /> As of June 1, 2015 all water retailers and wholesalers throughout the state are being held to the Governor's <br /> mandatory reduction of 25%. The Govemor has also announced certain incentives and rebates which staff has <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 15 June 2,2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.