Laserfiche WebLink
2.0 Overview of Connection Fees <br />2.1 Introduction <br />An important starting point in establishing connection fees is to have a basic understanding of <br />the purpose of these fees, along with criteria and general methodology that is used to establish <br />cost -based connection fees. Presented in this section of the report is an overview of <br />connection fees and the criteria and general methodology that is used to develop cost -based <br />connection fees. <br />2.2 Defining Connection Fees <br />The first step in establishing cost -based connection fees is to gain a better understanding of the <br />definition of a system development charge (SDC) or connection fee (CF).1 For the purposes of <br />this report, an SDC and /or CF is defined as follows: <br />"System development charges are one -time charges paid by new development to <br />finance construction of public facilities needed to serve them."2 <br />Simply stated, connection fees are a contribution of capital to either reimburse existing <br />customers for the available capacity in the existing system, or help finance planned future <br />growth - related capacity improvements. At some utilities, connection fees may be referred to <br />as system development charges, impact fees, capacity reserve charges, infrastructure <br />investment fees, etc. Regardless of the label used to identify them, their objective is the same. <br />That is, these charges are intended to provide funds to the utility to finance all or a part of the <br />capital improvements needed to serve and accommodate new customer growth. Absent those <br />fees, many utilities would likely be unwilling to build growth - related facilities (i.e., burden <br />existing rate payers with the entire cost of growth - related capacity expansion). <br />2.3 Economic Theory and Connection Fees <br />Connection fees are generally imposed as a condition of service. The objective of a connection <br />fee is not merely to generate money for a utility, but to ensure that all customers seeking to <br />connect to the utility's system bear an equitable share of the cost of excess capacity that <br />existing customers have invested in the existing system and any future growth - related <br />expansions. Through the implementation of fair and equitable connection fees, existing <br />customers will not be unduly burdened with the cost of new development. <br />By establishing cost -based recycled water connection fees, the City will be taking an important <br />step in providing adequate infrastructure to meet growth- related needs, and more importantly, <br />1 System development charges and connection fees used interchangeably in this section of the report. System <br />development charges are a more common term for these types of charges. <br />2 Arthur C. Nelson, System Development Charges for Water, Wastewater, and Stormwater Facilities Lewis <br />Publishers, New York, 1995, p. 1, <br />F Overview of Connection Fees 3 <br />City of Pleasanton - Recycled Water Connection Fee <br />