My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
061615
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 11:50:46 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 3:53:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/16/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
process resume at some point in the future, allowing the then discussion to focus on the actual <br /> merits of the plan. However, it is possible that enough time might pass that conditions could <br /> change such that the EIR would need to be amended if and when the process resumes. It is <br /> almost certain that at least a portion of the EIR would need to be revisited after 5 years, which <br /> could make completing that process now less than efficient. Additionally, opponents of the <br /> specific plan oppose completion of the EIR. <br /> • Option 2b <br /> Pause the planning process but allow the Task Force to make its final recommendation on the <br /> plan and proceed with certification of the EIR. This option provides the same drawbacks and <br /> benefits as 2a but increases efficiency by allowing the Task Force to complete its work, which is <br /> assumed to require anywhere from 1 to 3 additional meetings. <br /> • Option 3 <br /> Halt the planning process and any further work on the EIR. This option avoids the drawbacks <br /> but also precludes the potential benefits that could result from Option 1. It also allows for the <br /> possibility that the land within the plan area could be developed under current zoning, which <br /> would accommodate up to 1.68 million square feet of industrial development within the city limits <br /> but would forego the opportunity to complete El Charro Road at no expense to the city. <br /> Mayor Thome asked how much the process has cost to date. <br /> Mr. Dolan explained that the considerable amount of staff time expended over the last several years <br /> would be difficult to quantify, but that the plan areas property owners have spent something <br /> approaching $1 million on consultants for preparation of the plan and related environmental work. <br /> Mayor Thorne asked if it would require a General Plan amendment to halt the planning process now. <br /> Assistant City Attomey Seto said "no," explaining that many of its policies and programs are still <br /> pending. <br /> Mayor Thome noted that only one of the EIR alternatives contains high-density housing. Assuming the <br /> next round of RHNA contains higher density requirements, he asked if this would require preparation of <br /> a new or revised EIR. <br /> Mr. Dolan said it is possible, although it would ultimately depend on what those numbers were and how <br /> they alter the impacts identified. <br /> Mayor Thorne said there has been considerable discussion on the school site's proximity to the Airport <br /> Protection Area. While the plan currently places the school outside of this zone, he requested <br /> confirmation that approval of the location is ultimately up to the state. <br /> Mr. Dolan explained that there are multiple geographic designations surrounding the airport, some of <br /> which have certain restrictions. While the particular area proposed does not restrict schools, the state <br /> does require that any site within 2 miles of any airport receive specific approval. He noted that a good <br /> portion of the planning area would meet this same criteria and that Mohr Elementary is similarly located <br /> and was ultimately approved. <br /> Mayor Thome asked and Mr. Dolan confirmed that the school district's demographer's report included <br /> consideration of other residential projects that have been approved or are under construction within the <br /> city. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 15 May 19,2015 <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.