01 - Laserfiche WebLink

the Council to complete what has been a healthy process, certify the EIR and respect the tremendous effort put forth by city staff and consultants. Clark Morrison with Cox, Castle and Nicholson introduced himself as a land use attorney representing Legacy/Lionstone. He stated that the most significant outstanding issue raised tonight seems to be the drought. All others such as traffic and schools can be dealt with through the EIR and would not be an appropriate reason to halt the planning process. The applicants have therefore prepared a sample resolution that applies a standard by which the Council can determine the appropriate time to move forward again, based upon water supply. Specifically, Section 3 of the sample resolution states that any further consideration of the specific plan or other decisions regarding the plan will be suspended until such time as it has been demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Council that the city's total project water supplies during normal years, single dry years and multiple dry years will meet the water demand associated with the specific plan in addition to all of the city's other land uses. The resolution specifically provides that the Council base its determination upon consideration of the provisions of Section 9.30 of the Municipal Code as well as the final EIR for the specific plan where these water issues can be more fully fleshed out upon certification, which should contain a complete water analysis. Vice Mayor Brown asked how the EIR addresses the 29,000 additional vehicle trips per day that are projected to result from the plan. Mr. Morrison explained that the function of the EIR is to identify a set of environmental conclusions and then allow for the public to provide comments to those conclusions. The final EIR would then contain fact based recommendations on the available mitigations for the City Council to contemplate. Rather than saying those facts are of little importance and stopping the process here, allowing the EIR process to continue would help to answer questions like those raised by the Vice Mayor. Mayor Thome closed the public hearing. BREAK Mayor Thorne called a brief break from 9:16 p.m. to 9:24 p.m. Mayor Thorne said he initially favored stopping the EIR process but allowing the Task Force to proceed with formulating a recommendation. During the meeting, however, it has become clear to him that there are a number of other issues that need to be further evaluated by the community. He said that putting the issues of how to proceed now and whatever final plan might come forward to the voters would allow for an engaged debate on the pros and cons. Vice Mayor Brown agreed with the value of placing this on the ballot as is evidenced by numerous other landmark planning decisions made in this community. She said she is impressed with intelligence and engagement the public has demonstrated and that she trusts them to make smart decisions based on what they value about Pleasanton. While she initially supported Option 3, she said she could also support the Mayor's recommendation. Councilmember Narum said her position also evolved throughout the meeting and that she is now inclined to agree with the Mayor and Vice Mayor. She would, however, like to allow the Task Force to wrap up its process with a formal recommendation. She requested clarification on how the status of the EIR would affect the binding nature of the public vote. Ms. Seto explained that without a certified EIR, the ballot measure be advisory in nature. Mr. Fialho described a two part process, the first of which would ask the voters in November whether or the planning process should continue as originally described, with the results of the Task Force effort City Council Minutes Page 12 of 15 May 19, 2015