My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
060215
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:01:04 PM
Creation date
5/28/2015 9:18:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/2/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
8
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution No. 98-90 <br /> Page 2 <br /> WHEREAS, the Plan and Study describe the impacts of contemplated future development on <br /> existing public facilities in the Tri-Valley Development Area, which includes the <br /> incorporated and unincorporated portions of Alameda County and Contra Costa <br /> County and which includes Pleasanton, through the year 2010, and contain an <br /> analysis of the need for new public facilities and improvements required by future <br /> development within the Tri-Valley Development Area, including Pleasanton; and <br /> WHEREAS, the County of Alameda, County of Contra Costa, City of Dublin, City of <br /> Livermore, City of Pleasanton City of San Ramon and Town of Danville are <br /> parties to an agreement entitled "Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Pertaining to <br /> Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fees for Traffic Mitigation," dated <br /> September 1, 1998 ("JPA"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation/Califomia Transportation <br /> Commission approved a Negative Declaration (SCH#96042087) September 19, <br /> 1996 for the I-580/1-680 Interchange Project ("580/680 Interchange Negative <br /> Declaration"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the Plan and Study set forth the relationship between future development in <br /> Pleasanton, the needed improvements and facilities, and the estimated costs of <br /> those improvements and facilities; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Plan and Study were available for public inspection and review for ten (10) <br /> days prior to this public hearing; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows: <br /> A. The purpose of the Tri-Valley Transportation Development Fee (hereafter <br /> "TVTD Fee") is to finance Transportation Improvement Projects needed to <br /> reduce the traffic-related impacts caused by future development in the <br /> Tri-Valley Development Area, including Pleasanton. With the exception of <br /> "Ramp Metering" which is not a Transportation Improvement Project, the <br /> Transportation Improvement Projects are listed in the Plan in Table 8-3 and <br /> consist of the following eleven (11) projects which are hereafter defined <br /> and referred to as "Transportation Improvement Projects". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.