Laserfiche WebLink
because the East Side is not critical to meeting our current statewide housing obligations, but may be required <br /> following 2022. <br /> Regardless,the Mayor and Council have asked that the matter be returned to the City Council for a <br /> comprehensive update and to determine whether the planning process should be stopped. This matter has been <br /> set for the May 19th City Council Meeting. <br /> Again,thank you for writing and taking the time to be informed about our community. I hope you find this <br /> information useful. Please let us know if you need additional clarification about the timeline or process. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Nelson Fialho <br /> City Manager <br /> From: Ann alderete [mailto:annalderete @yahoo.comj <br /> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 2:00 PM <br /> To: Maria Hoey; Mayor and City Council; PTown Weekly #2; Livermore Independent; skhanna @bayareanewsgroup.com <br /> Cc: Fred Alderete <br /> Subject: PROPOSED EAST PLEASANTON SPECIFIC PLAN <br /> Dear Council Members, <br /> I will be out of town for the upcoming City Council Meeting on May 19, 2015 and I would like the <br /> Counsel to represent me with a permanent NO vote for the development of East <br /> Pleasanton. This development is not in the best interest of Pleasanton residents for many reason. <br /> We need to absorb the state mandated 1900 housing units before planning any new <br /> development. Listed are additional key items that support my request for the Council to vote NO. <br /> SCHOOLS: - 1300 NEW students (per PUSD Demographer's report April 2015) <br /> - Developers may offer a K-5 school <br /> - No capital money for our cash-strapped middle schools or high schools <br /> TRAFFIC: - Will create a traffic nightmare with 29,000+ new car trips per day on Pleasanton <br /> Streets <br /> - Encourages cut-through traffic from southbound drivers on 580, Dublin and San <br /> Ramon - 1300 new homes will create traffic logjams on First St, Valley, <br /> Bernal and more. <br /> WATER: - Pleasanton taxpayers are spending $19 million for recycled water/purple pipe <br /> systems so - YOU can have more drinking water, not 1300 new homes. <br /> - This is not the time to add to our limited water supply problems. <br /> HEALTH: - Our valley is "non-attainment" for national and state ozone levels, and small <br /> particulate standards. <br /> - Located near noisy and dirty industrial gravel mining companies, in use until 2040+. <br /> 2 <br />