My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
051915
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:15:38 PM
Creation date
5/14/2015 4:52:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subject: FW: East Pleasanton Plan-Traffic model & predictions <br /> Attachments: Economic Development Strategic report Aug 2103.pdf; 2013 Final Overall Pleasanton <br /> Transportation Report.pdf <br /> SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL <br /> Provided to the City Council <br /> From:• 1 After Distribution of Packet <br /> Sent:Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:43 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council 5-19 —2-0/J <br /> Cc: Mike Tassano Date <br /> Subject: East Pleasanton Plan-Traffic model &predictions <br /> My name is John Bauer <br /> I live and work in South Pleasanton <br /> During the neighborhood meetings, it was stated that the traffic model <br /> being used by staff (for all plans) is based upon a survey of 351 Pleasanton <br /> residents, and major employers in the City. <br /> The survey was done by Valerie Brock Consulting for the City of Pleasanton, <br /> Sept 2013. <br /> The report reveals that according to the survey, 38% of Pleasanton <br /> residents work in Pleasanton, and that trend is increasing (%). <br /> A report also done for the City of Pleasanton titled Pleasanton Economic <br /> Development Strategic Plan: Background Report using data from US census <br /> concludes that in 2011 17.6% of residents reported they worked in <br /> Pleasanton. In 1990 it was 27.3% <br /> If traffic models are based on 38%, and the actual is 17.6%, then the <br /> predicted outcomes will not be valid. <br /> The Brock report focuses only on Pleasanton workers. It will not capture <br /> the congestion due to cut-through traffic from Dublin, Livermore, or the <br /> Central Valley. <br /> It also does not take into account the traffic congestion caused by school <br /> drop-off and pick-ups/ <br /> The Pleasanton Economic Development Strategic Plan: Background <br /> Report bases their conclusions based upon regional US Census data (Tri- <br /> Valley) . <br /> I believe that the Pleasanton Economic Development Strategic Plan: <br /> Background Report provides more comprehensive data which models <br /> should be based upon. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.