My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
051915
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:15:38 PM
Creation date
5/14/2015 4:52:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Again, thank you for writing and taking the time to be informed about our community. I hope you find this <br /> information useful. Please let us know if you need additional clarification about the timeline or process. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Nelson Fialho <br /> City Manager <br /> From:Ted S. Chu] <br /> Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 10:30 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Subject: STOP the EPSP Development Project <br /> Dear Mayor and City Council Members, <br /> As you may have heard and witnessed during the community town hall meetings, citizens of Pleasanton are <br /> deeply concerned about the EPSP plan and questioned the validity of many elements in the EIR. We welcome <br /> the fact that the fate of the EPSP is on the agenda for the City Council Meeting on May 19th. We strongly urge <br /> our elected officials to place the well-being and wish of the residents of Pleasant above any special interest <br /> groups. The citizens of Pleasanton strongly oppose the massive sprawl in Pleasanton. While we understand <br /> many hours have been put into the EIR,we found many data points in the report were derived from some <br /> ancient"traffic models" and incorrect assumptions that do not represent the real traffic problem the Pleasanton <br /> residents have to face every single day. In addition, we were told there's nothing can be done to improve traffic <br /> over First Street leading to highway 680. If there is no mitigation possible, why continue with the house build <br /> out that unquestionably will add thousands of more cars to the same streets that can no longer be expanded to <br /> support the estimated traffic increase? It just does not make sense to continue with the aggressive EPSP <br /> development. Also extending El Charro will only add more traffic in the streets of Pleasanton, especially <br /> during morning and afternoon commute hours. How is that going help reduce traffic congestion if 1300 <br /> housing units were built? The citizens of Pleasanton clearly reject the massive development plan(EPSP) in <br /> Pleasanton and the inaccuracy presented in the EIR. Instead, the citizens of Pleasanton wish our elected <br /> officials to redirect resources, energy and efforts to work on solving real problems such as ever-worsening <br /> traffic congestion, over-crowding schools and shortage of water,just to name a few. It's time to stop the EPSP <br /> project once for all. <br /> Best regards, <br /> Ted Chu <br /> Resident of Pleasanton <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.