051915 - Laserfiche WebLink

PUBLIC COMMENT During previous years staff has invited and held an informational meeting with property owners from the four GHADs to answer questions and promote a better understanding of the GHADs. These are some of the issues that were addressed: a) Residents were concerned whether their assessments were going to increase this year. In several previous years, staff was able to advise those residents that the index for the GHADs provided for no change in the assessment from the previous year. However this year, as happened last year, a nominal two percent increase is recommended based upon the ENR index. b) Residents from the Laurel Creek GRAD commented about the amount of reserves in their GHAD and wanted to know if there was a cap of the reserves. Staff explained the Plan of Control for the GHAD anticipates a major event every 10 years, and since the Laurel Creek GHAD is over 10 years old and there has not been an event, the reserves have continued to grow. Staff explained that reserves are like an insurance policy, if a landslide occurred funds from the reserves could be immediately available to repair the landslide. If there were not sufficient funds in the reserves to repair the slide, some other method of payment for the repairs would be necessary such as borrowing money or selling bonds. In either case the property owners within the GHAD would be responsible for these costs. Our consultant has stated the cost of repairing a small landslide could cost over $300,000 and a large landslide could be over $1,000,000. Based on these numbers staff and our consultant have determined there are not sufficient reserves in the Laurel Creek GHAD. In several years when the reserves grow larger our consultant can update our current risk assessment based upon current history of the GHAD and recalculate the probability of a major event and cost. c) Residents asked why the reserves were not earning a higher rate of return, which could then offset the amount of the assessments. Staff explained that the investment vehicles available to public entities were limited and conservative, so a high rate of return could not be expected in this low interest rate environment. d) Residents of "The Preserve" sought an explanation of the prior annexation to the Laurel Creek GRAD of the Kolb Ranch and Oak Hill Estate developments due to concerns that those annexed areas appeared to have much steeper slopes, and thought that higher risk was thus assumed by the Laurel Creek GHAD. The GRAD geotechnical consultant, ENGEO, brought geotechnical maps from The Preserve, Kolb Ranch, and Oak Hill Estates, to show that while the annexed areas appear steeper, there are more documented landslide and earth movement risks within the Preserve, such that the respective risks are equivalent. In addition, because the areas have similar improvements needing the same type of maintenance and monitoring, the assessments for all 121 properties in the Laurel Creek GRAD are the same. Page 4 of 5