My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
051915
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:12:50 PM
Creation date
5/13/2015 11:30:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
14
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> The preparation of an EPSP is called for in the City's General Plan and is identified as a <br /> priority on the March 2015 City Council Work Plan. A planning process for the Plan Area <br /> was initiated as early as 1998, but completion of the plan was deferred in 1999 in order <br /> to complete the Bernal Property Specific Plan. More recently, the EPSP Task Force and <br /> City staff have worked on developing and refining the EPSP since the summer of 2012. <br /> The Task Force originally agreed on a set of six working draft plan alternatives that <br /> included a mix of open space, park, industrial, campus office, school, retail, and high- <br /> and low-density residential land uses. The original residential components of the six <br /> alternatives ranged from 1,000 to 2,279 residential units. In August 2014, after the City <br /> Council directed staff and the Task Force to explore plan alternatives that did not <br /> include zoning for high-density housing, the Task Force voted to change the "Base <br /> Plan" evaluated in the Draft EPSP to include 1,300 residential units with no high-density <br /> housing, 1,636,000 square feet of non-residential development, 759 acres of open <br /> space, and an elementary school site. City Council confirmed this Base Plan in <br /> December 2014 and directed that nine plan alternatives be evaluated in the DEIR on <br /> the Draft EPSP, ranging from an alternative allowing for no development to an <br /> alternative containing 1,430 single-family and multi-family residential units. <br /> The DEIR was published on April 2, 2015, and was followed by three neighborhood <br /> meetings to receive input on the Draft EPSP, which were held on the following dates: <br /> Sunday, April 12; Thursday, April 23; and Wednesday, April 29, 2015. These <br /> neighborhood meetings were widely attended by residents throughout the City, with <br /> attendance exceeding 100 persons at all meetings (attendance at the second meeting <br /> was approximately 200 persons). Overall, the residents who spoke at the neighborhood <br /> meetings expressed opposition to moving forward with the EPSP, due primarily to <br /> concerns associated with the ongoing drought, traffic impacts, school capacity, and <br /> because the EPSP is not critical to meeting the City's current statewide housing <br /> obligations, or Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) requirements. A summary of <br /> the neighborhood meetings is attached to this report as Attachment 2. The City Council <br /> and staff have also received significant written communication subsequent to the <br /> neighborhood meetings, which is available at the Planning Division upon request. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The Draft EPSP, as noted above, is the culmination of a nearly three-year planning <br /> process overseen by a 19-member task force (with 2 alternates) intended to establish a <br /> land use and circulation pattern that would govern future development in the 1,100-acre <br /> plan area. Program 6.1 of the Pleasanton General Plan 2005-2025 states: <br /> Prepare a Specific Plan for East Pleasanton as a coordinated effort between property owners, <br /> major stakeholders, and the Pleasanton community, including residents of East Pleasanton. <br /> Although the General Plan map indicates several types of land use that may be considered in the <br /> specific planning process, this General Plan confers no entitlement to any future development of <br /> land in East Pleasanton. <br /> The current draft Base Plan EPSP would result in substantial new development in the <br /> Plan Area and entail an adjustment to the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), but would <br /> Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.