My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 4
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
051915
>
15 ATTACHMENT 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:13:58 PM
Creation date
5/12/2015 3:48:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Landolf stated that the landscape architect worked hard to make a nice, usable <br /> space in the backyard, and any change to it would use up space in that backyard. <br /> Commissioner Nagler noted that changes are obviously possible in this case. <br /> Mr. Landolf said yes. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that the area to the right side of the house looks like a <br /> natural area with all the trees and is not being touched a lot. <br /> Mr. Landolf said yes. He added that there is an area above, basically the top of the lot <br /> and the left hand side of the lot, that are also staying as is. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Nagler stated that, first of all, it is a fabulous house and congratulated <br /> the applicant for being able to build such a dream house. lie indicated that as he was <br /> reading through the materials and beyond the brief statement that the architect made, <br /> he was unclear about the compromises that may have been made along the way to get <br /> the actual design before the Commission today. He added that he does not believe he <br /> had adequate information to be able to vote to recommend approval of the construction <br /> of this house. He explained that it may very well be that the placement of the house on <br /> the property, its orientation, its orientation to the street, to the topography may actually <br /> be the best it can be, but what he personally cannot tell is what the impacts and the <br /> trade-offs would be between rotating the house a bit, presumably satisfying some of the <br /> obviously heart-felt opinions of the neighbor, and how much more grading that would <br /> imply and the impact of that grading; and to allow the Commission to make a straight-up <br /> sort of decision or recommendation based on what the best possible use of the property <br /> is; how close one can come to creating a good-neighbor situation to protect the current <br /> next-door neighbor and to allow this house to be constructed because it is certainly <br /> appropriate to the neighborhood. He reiterated that he does not feel enough <br /> information has been presented for him personally to be able to support the <br /> construction. <br /> Commissioner Piper stated that her personal feeling is that all of the information that <br /> has been provided to the Commission does conform particularly to the neighborhood <br /> design. She indicated that when she drives around the neighborhood, which she does <br /> quite often, and knowing this lot, what has been submitted seems to fit the <br /> neighborhood, what it looks and feels like. She stated that it sounds like the applicant <br /> and the project staff has done a lot of work, the HOA has approved the design, and they <br /> have worked with the City and made a lot of changes. She added that the house on <br /> 8023 Golden Eagle Way appears to have a tremendous amount of grading which looks <br /> like a bit more than 40 percent. She indicated that her personal opinion is that the <br /> Commission is at a point where it should be able to move forward. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, March 25, 2015 Page 6 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.