My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENT 4
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
051915
>
15 ATTACHMENT 4
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 12:13:58 PM
Creation date
5/12/2015 3:48:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENT 4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mark Landolf, Project Architect displayed a representation of the 3-D model he did on the <br /> house, based on the floor plan. He pointed out that the difference between what <br /> Mr. Monzo has shown and this display is its perspective, as it is not a flat drawing. <br /> Referring to the Commission's question regarding the history of the HOA approval, <br /> Mr. Landolf stated that the house that was first presented had a two-story element in the <br /> front, a one-story porch, and a big patio in the front. He indicated that he later moved the <br /> house to the back of the lot as far as the building envelope would allow and pushed the <br /> second floor back, which is what the current plan shows. He added that he also changed <br /> the landscape elements. He noted that situating the house the way it is actually meets the <br /> contours of the lot and thus reduces the grading on this lot. He pointed out that the lot is <br /> not steep enough to push the back of the house into the hillside, and moving the house <br /> back any further would make it difficult to have a useful backyard. He indicated that he <br /> would work with anyone who had objections to the house colors. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor referred to the rendering presented and asked Mr. Landolf if <br /> rotating the house would show the fireplace and the rotunda. <br /> Mr. Landolf said yes. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor referred to the slide of the site plan and noted that the proposed <br /> house is about touching the rear of the envelope. <br /> Ms. Wallis confirmed that was correct. <br /> Mr. Landolf stated that was the intention on the left side and that the contour lines can be <br /> seen right through the house. He added that the house is trying to be parallel to the <br /> contour lines to reduce grading. <br /> Chair Allen inquired if this envelope is documented on the plot plan that the HOA has. <br /> Ms. Wallis replied that the suggested building envelope comes directly from the design <br /> guidelines. <br /> Chair Allen further inquired if anyone in the HOA could see this if he or she chose to look <br /> for this with any kind of empty lot that still exists. <br /> Ms. Wallis said yes. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that if the house were to be rotated to make it more in line <br /> with the grading and topography of the lot, it looked to him like it should be rotated in the <br /> opposite direction to align it with the other homes on the street. He further noted that <br /> rotating it counter-clockwise would align it with the stepping of the hill. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, March 25, 2015 Page 3 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.