Laserfiche WebLink
AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k) <br /> Introduction <br /> Low income families have difficulty securing housing without income supports and/or housing <br /> assistance. Many times they also do not have additional income to pay for other needs such as food, <br /> child care, health care and dependable transportation. Living from paycheck to paycheck causes families <br /> to be in constant danger of becoming or returning to homelessness. According to the 2010 Census, <br /> 13.2%(3,243)of Pleasanton's households were low income;8.7%(2,147)were very low income(50%or <br /> below median household income)and 5.7%(1,396)were extremely low income (at or below 30%of <br /> median household income). The 2000 Alameda County median family income was $67,600. In 2015, it is <br /> $92,900.This is a 37% increase in 15 years. Many lower income families are not keeping pace when <br /> incomes rise. <br /> The most commonly available anti-poverty strategies are implemented at the county level and are <br /> addressed in the County's section of the Consolidated Plan. The Section 8 certificate and voucher <br /> program for Pleasanton residents is currently coordinated through the Housing Authority of the County <br /> of Alameda (HACA). The City will consider supporting requests by residents of,local senior apartment <br /> complexes to receive additional rent subsidies for seniors as opportunities arise. [HACA recently <br /> approved a formal award of 50 Project-based Section 8 Vouchers for the first phase of the Kottinger <br /> Gardens senior housing development.] <br /> Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs <br /> There is significant focus on the provision of affordable housing,supportive social services, and <br /> community development programs in Pleasanton among all levels of the public and private sectors. A <br /> primary strength of the housing and community development delivery systems is the coordination of <br /> efforts between the jurisdictionsand the groups that oversee these efforts on an inter-jurisdictional <br /> basis. These groups, including the Urban Country Technical Advisory Committees,the Alameda County <br /> Housing and Community Development.Advisory Committee and EveryOne Home,allow the different <br /> jurisdictions to ensure that projects compliment rather than duplicate efforts,and that policies and <br /> programs have some consistency throughout the Urban County. An additional strength is the growing <br /> level of coordination between service providers, particularly those addressing housing needs of the <br /> homeless and special needs poiiulations, and affordable housing in collaborations. Non-housing <br /> community development programs within the Urban County have involved coordination between the <br /> Urban County jurisdictions and the agencies or organizations focused on the particular community <br /> development area,which might be infrastructure improvements, economic development,accessibility <br /> improvements or child care. <br /> Consolidated Plan PLEASANTON 68 <br /> OMB Control No:2506-0117(exp.07/31/2015) <br />