My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012015
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
CCMIN012015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2015 2:28:35 PM
Creation date
3/31/2015 2:28:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/20/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AYES: Councilmembers Narum, Olson, Pentin, Vice Mayor Brown <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Mayor Thorne <br /> Mr. Fialho complimented the community on its efforts but said that success would not have been <br /> possible without the strong leadership of Mr. Smith and the extraordinary efforts of his staff. He <br /> commended Mr. Smith for going above and beyond what one individual can reasonably be expected to <br /> accomplish. <br /> 13. Consider approval of the Conceptual Plan for a new off-leash dog park on the Bernal Property <br /> adjacent to the Marilyn Murphy Kane Trail staging area and direction regarding park funding <br /> Assistant City Manager Bocian gave a PowerPoint presentation outlining the Conceptual Plan for the <br /> 1.4 acre site approved by the City Council in July 2014. He briefly reviewed the site analysis which <br /> examined possible issues related to the sanitary sewer line that traverses the project, existing parking, <br /> a dirt stockpile used for maintenance purposes, the Marilyn Murphy Kane Trail and Arroyo de Laguna. <br /> He also reviewed several independent studies which, while not required, were conducted to address <br /> certain concerns raised early on in the process. A biological field survey was prepared in response to <br /> concern over the impact to wildlife currently frequenting the site, and concluded they would simply <br /> move to the next available location. <br /> Mr. Bocian presented several slides depicting key points of the plan, noting that as proposed the park is <br /> comprised of an approximately 11,000 square foot area in the northern section of the site for a small <br /> dog area and a the remainder reserved for all dogs. A shade structure and fencing would straddle both <br /> portions of the side and tree and other landscape plantings would provide additional shade as well as a <br /> buffer between the park and residential uses. Acknowledging the obvious issues with a natural turf <br /> surface, the architect has proposed an engineered wood fiber base known as Fibar. Fibar is widely <br /> used in both dog parks and playgrounds, largely due to its natural compacting ability which helps to <br /> relieve the potential for splinters that is often seen with woodchips. A vinyl coated fence approximately <br /> 5 feet tall along the trail side and 3.5 feet along the remaining sides, including between the two portions <br /> of the site, would surround the park. Additional features include a public bulletin board for posting <br /> notices, rules and regulations, waste dispensers at two locations, several dog agility type structures, <br /> and additional bench seating. <br /> Following the public workshop with the Parks and Recreation Commission in October 2014, staff <br /> received a number of emails from neighbors expressing concern over the park. An informal <br /> neighborhood meeting was held to meet with residents and discuss potential options. One of the <br /> primary concerns related to overflow parking, particularly in the Meadowlark area whose residents <br /> maintain that trail users already park on residential streets. Staff has monitored the area recently and <br /> has not seen evidence to support that, but cannot say that it has not occurred. Residents expressed <br /> concern over increase traffic. An assessment by Traffic Engineer Tassano concluded that the increase <br /> in traffic would be minimal and no different than the typical traffic fluctuations seen on any regular day. <br /> Residents also expressed concern over noise from both human and canine park users. Staff <br /> acknowledges that the area is currently quite tranquil and that there is some potential for the closest <br /> residences, which range from 200 to 500 feet away, to hear some noise from the park, the bulk of <br /> which will hopefully be mitigated with the additional trees and shrubberies proposed. Finally, residents <br /> expressed concern that the park would not be a welcome addition to the community and would <br /> adversely impact property values. Staff feels that property values are a much larger macro issue in <br /> general but also that parks and amenities such as this generally do have that type of affect. <br /> Taking these concerns into account, the Parks and Recreation Commission elected to eliminate the <br /> second shade structure along the southern end of the site in an effort to not encourage gathering of <br /> larger groups here. They also pulled back the southern edge of the site quite a bit and increased the <br /> number of trees and shrub plantings proposed. In response to parking concerns, an area to potentially <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 12 January 20, 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.