My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
031715
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:42:33 PM
Creation date
3/11/2015 11:37:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
3
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FEHR '' PEERS <br /> Task 4—Congestion Management Agency Assessment <br /> A separate analysis of regional roadways is recommended to comply with requirements of the Alameda <br /> County Transportation Commission (ACTC). The ACTC requires the analysis of project impacts on <br /> Metropolitan Transportation System (MTS) roadways for development projects that would generate more <br /> than 100 PM peak hour trips. The ACTC requires that the baseline forecasts be represented by the model <br /> run completed by the ACTC. Fehr & Peers proposes to add the project-related traffic directly to the <br /> baseline forecasts and compare the net change as a percentage of total traffic. The ACTC model is based <br /> on the 2020 and 2035 forecast years. It will be used to evaluate segments on the following roadways in <br /> the City: 1-680, 1-580, Stoneridge Drive, Las Positas Road, Foothill Road, and Hopyard Road. Conditions <br /> with the project will also be analyzed. <br /> Task 5—Project Alternative <br /> We will calculate the trip generating potential of three land use alternatives and qualitatively compare the <br /> level of trip generation that of the preferred alternative to draw conclusions regarding the relative impact <br /> of a project alternative to the preferred alternative. <br /> Task 6—Documentation <br /> We will prepare the following documents: <br /> • Draft Technical Memorandum <br /> • Final Technical Memorandum <br /> • Response to comments on the Draft EIR <br /> This scope of work assumes that only minor editorial comments are received on the Draft Technical <br /> Memorandum. We budgeted 12 staff hours to prepare the final report, which will then be incorporated <br /> into the EIR by others on the team. As the number of comments on the Draft ER is unknown, we have <br /> budgeted 8 hours to prepare responses to comments. A budget amendment may be necessary if the <br /> number of comments and the level of complexity exceed 8 hours of effort. <br /> MEETINGS <br /> This scope of work assumes attendance at one staff level meeting and one public hearing. We will be <br /> available to attend additional meetings on a time-and-materials basis. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.