My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 2112
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
2101 - 2200
>
ORD 2112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:22:25 PM
Creation date
2/19/2015 11:35:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
2112
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 17.36 <br /> GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM <br /> Sections: <br /> 17.36.010 Purpose. <br /> 17.36.020 Objectives. <br /> 17.36.030 Building permit restriction. <br /> 17.36.040 Exemptions. <br /> 17.36.050 Administration of the growth management program. <br /> 17.36.060 Establishment of annual new residential unit limits. <br /> 17.36.080 Approval procedures. <br /> 17.36.090 Use and loss of growth management approval. <br /> 17.36.100 Modification to projects with growth management approval. <br /> 17.36.110 Fees and exactions. <br /> 17.36.120 Application to prior approved projects. <br /> 17.36.010 Purpose. <br /> A. Since the mid-1960s, Pleasanton's transformation from a small, agricultural-based <br /> community to a suburban bedroom community and then to a suburban "edge city" has <br /> been marked by periods of rapid growth which stressed the city's ability to provide <br /> infrastructure and services, affecting the quality of life of both existing and new residents. <br /> B. In order to minimize the adverse effects of rapid uncontrolled residential growth, the city <br /> council adopted its first growth management ordinance in 1978, designed to regulate the <br /> location and rate of new residential growth in a period of sewage treatment capacity <br /> constraints brought about by air quality degradation concerns. Through the 1980s and <br /> 1990s, the city council modified the growth management ordinance in order to better <br /> achieve the evolving goals set for it, with the rate, location, and type of residential units <br /> regulated to achieve the general welfare of the city. <br /> C. In 1996, the city council adopted a comprehensive revision to its general plan. Key goals <br /> and policies reflect the city's continued commitment to developing in an efficient, orderly, <br /> and logical fashion, ensuring adequate infrastructure and services are present to ensure <br /> that the city's quality of life and level of services are maintained. The general plan calls for <br /> assuring its citizens of a predictable growth rate, while providing housing to meet the needs <br /> of all economic segments of the community, regional housing needs, and employment <br /> growth. <br /> D. Despite the controls established by past versions of the city's growth management <br /> program, residential development has continued to fluctuate over time, there has been little <br /> predictability of the actual number of new building permits issued and development under <br /> construction, and there is uncertainty over the city's ability to maintain its service levels and <br /> quality of life for its citizens due to regional influences and uncertain revenue sources for <br /> city and other local service-providing agencies. <br /> E. This revised growth management program has been designed to rectify the areas wherein <br /> the former programs did not totally succeed; to establish a predictable growth rate which <br /> reflects community sentiment and which alleviates the potential for strain on the ability of <br /> the city and other local service providers to keep pace with services with no reduction in <br /> their quality; to continue to relate new residential growth to housing needs (including <br /> regional needs and local employment growth) and the availability of infrastructure and <br /> services; to move toward build-out of the community in a logical manner while affording <br /> future development areas the ability to accommodate changing housing demands; and to <br /> be fair and equitable to the development community, developers large and small, who have <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.