My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
021715
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:34:49 PM
Creation date
2/11/2015 3:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
9
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> Mr. Schlachte stated that there may be some confusion about what is a hive versus <br /> what is not a hive. He explained that beekeepers consider a hive the stack, and they <br /> generally stack two boxes on top of each other, with a separate third one where the <br /> honey is produced. He noted that limiting beekeepers to two hives also limits the <br /> amount of bees that can actually produce honey, and encourage the Commission to <br /> look at three or more hives per property. <br /> Mr. Schlachte then referred to the fees associated with beekeeping, stating that good <br /> reporting and avoiding neighborhood impact result from voluntary compliance. He <br /> indicated that that puffing a fee on beekeeping would bring beekeepers here, but there <br /> would be no reporting or indication of where hives are located. He encouraged the <br /> Commission to think about voluntary compliance, and then adding in fees down the <br /> road after seeing what the impact might be. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he knowslbeekeeping involves a‘fee but that he did <br /> not see one in the staff report. <br /> Ms. Amos replied that the dollar amount was not included the staff report 'She <br /> indicated that staff kept the fee similar td that of a Conditional Use Permit, which is a <br /> one-time $150 fee. She added thatthere"is-no fee for the inspection. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired what the-fee is fora sign. <br /> Ms. Amos replied thatit is $15\and added'that-Planning staff does not have to go out <br /> and inspect on a sign. <br /> Commissioner Balch commented that-Planning does not need to go out and inspect on <br /> a beeshive either; Code Enforcement does,, <br /> Ms. Amoe,clarified that Code Enforcement would inspect through Planning, but the <br /> Building Division inspects on a,sign. <br /> Commissioner Balch inquired if those are not Community Development. <br /> Ms. Amos replied that they are part of Community Development but not part of <br /> Planning. She explainedlha.t Community Development has separate Divisions, <br /> including Building and Safety, Planning, Engineering, and Traffic Engineering. <br /> Commission Balch stated that he is going to draw the line because he is a little bit <br /> concerned of the cost, and inquired what the cost for a dog license is. <br /> Ms. Amos replied that that dog licensing is done through another Department; it costs <br /> about $9 for three years but is subject to renewal. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, 1/28/2015 Page 7 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.