My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2015
>
021715
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:34:49 PM
Creation date
2/11/2015 3:36:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2015
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
9
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that the proposed Code amendment limits the number <br /> of hives on Agricultural-zoned properties to ten hives; however, the staff report indicates <br /> that the State limits that to nine hives. He asked staff to clarify this discrepancy. <br /> Ms. Amos noted that the State would not require registration if there were ten hives. <br /> She added that the agency representative stated that registration is a casual process <br /> and that the State defers to the agency that oversees the registration process and <br /> issues the permits. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if there would be any'conaideration for more than two <br /> hives for R-1-zoned properties that are substantial in size, such as over so many square <br /> feet. <br /> Ms. Amos replied that staff looked at evaluating what other cities have done in terms of <br /> minimum lot sizes in relation to having more than two hives; staff found that this would <br /> be more cumbersome and complicated and that it would be more balanced if the <br /> restriction would be the number of hives perproperty versus limitingthe number of <br /> hives based on lot size. She indicated, however, that the Commissiori'naay feel that the <br /> number of hives ought to be based on a minimum lot size, such that someone with a <br /> half-acre or 20,000-square-foot lot, fonexample, could potentially have two to four hives. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that if the limit is two hives per property, a detached <br /> townhome with a very, very small lot would be allowed two hives, the same as someone <br /> else who might have ahalf-acre•or full-acre..lot. He inquired if there would be a <br /> provision to get some latitude in the City to,approve more than two hives for larger lot <br /> sizes. <br /> Ms. Amos replied ti iat$the Commission,could consider that <br /> Mr. Weinstein stated thatstaff is proceeding a little bit cautiously and feels that this is a <br /> reasonablestarting point for beekeeping as a new endeavor in the City. He indicated <br /> that staff wants to be cognisant of neighbors' issues concerning beekeeping and to <br /> make sure that commercial production of honey and commercial-sized beekeeping is <br /> not established in-the City, at least at this initial stage. He added that, as Ms. Amos <br /> mentioned, staff also looked atseveral cities with established beekeeping ordinances, <br /> and they typically allow•around two hives per lot regardless of lot size. <br /> Acting Chair Ritter inquired if the water source should be within ten feet of the hive or <br /> not in excess of ten feet. <br /> Ms. Amos replied that it should be within ten feet. <br /> Acting Chair Ritter referred to a statement in the staff report that a beekeeping permit <br /> would not be granted if a neighbor objects due to a life-threatening allergy to honey <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, 1/28/2015 Page 2 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.