|
istr-
<br /> LEGAL NOTICES LEGAL NOTICES
<br /> IN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE situated in the Township of Pleas-
<br /> CITY OF PLEASANTON, anton. County of Alameda State
<br /> COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE of California, described as follows:
<br /> OF CALIFORNIA COMMENCING at the inter- •
<br /> ORDINANCE NO. 288 section of the westerly lino of
<br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING} that certain 100 acre parcel of
<br /> THE ANNEXATION OP CERTAIN land conveyed by Juana H. Nevis
<br /> UNINHABITED T E R R I T 0 It Y, to Kate 5. 1888 ry by deed dated
<br /> DESIGNATED "ANNEXATION NO. obey 8. 8, in and recorded eds-
<br /> 9, FA GEOVNDS ANNSS" TO abet page 3 8 in there—,
<br /> 354 c Deeds
<br /> TUE CITY or PLEASANTON Alam da 3County. California dwith
<br /> BE IT ORDAINED BY THE the northerly line of County Road
<br /> COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF No, 2000, commonly known eat.
<br /> PLEASANTON: Bernal Avenue, said point being'.
<br /> WHEREAS. on April 28, 1958. also an angle point in the bound
<br /> the Council of the City of ary of the City of Pleasanton, -
<br /> Pleasanton did pass and adopt and running thence along said
<br /> Resolution No. 2759 giving no- northerly line of County Road
<br /> Lice of the proposal to annex cer- No. 2000' West 1672.89 feet to
<br /> taro uninhabited territory to the an intersection thereof with the
<br /> City of Pleasanton, said territory westerly line of that certain
<br /> being therein designated as "An- 53.193 acre parcel of land con
<br /> nexation No. 9, Fairgrounds An- veyed by Robert H. Dana, and
<br /> sex,' said Resolution describing the Sarah E. Dana, his wife, to the
<br /> boundaries of the territory propos- County of Alameda by deed d ted
<br /> ed to be annexed; and June 24, 1949 and recorded ne
<br /> WHEREAS. said Resolution No. 28, 1949 in Book 5830 of 0 lcial
<br /> •'759 did contain a notice of the day, Records at page 292 thereof, Rec-
<br /> hour and place when and where the ords of Alameda County, Califor-
<br /> Council of the City would hear pro- nia; thence along the westerly
<br /> tests made by an • person owning line of said 53.193 acre parcel
<br /> real property within the territory North 1186.90 feet, more or less.
<br /> proposed to be annexed. the time to the southwesterly corner of
<br /> of said hearing being not less than that certain 5.275 acre parcel of
<br /> fifteen no; more than fifty days land conveyed by the City and-
<br /> from the date of passage of said County of San Francisco, a Mu-
<br /> Resolution; and nicipal Corporation, to Robert H.
<br /> WHEREAS, on June 9. 1958. at Dana, and Sarah E. Dana. his.
<br /> the hour of 8:00 P. M. in the wife, by deed dated August 25
<br /> Council Chambers in the City Hall 1939 and recorded in Book 3778
<br /> of the City of Pleasanton, County of Official Records at page 434
<br /> of Alameda, State of California, thereof, Records of Alameda
<br /> said time and place being the day, County, California; thence con-
<br />' hour and place fixed in said Reso- tinuing along said westerly line
<br /> lution No. 2759 for hearing pro- of said 53.193 acre parcel North
<br /> tests to the said annexation, the 0° 07' 30" East 200.00 feet to the
<br /> said City Council did hear and pass northwesterly corner thereof;
<br /> upon all protests made to the pro- thence along the northerly line
<br /> posed annexation and did determine of said 53.193 acre parcel
<br /> that
<br /> protests had not been made South 89° 52' 30" East 1672.03
<br /> by the owners of one-half of the feet to an intersection thereof
<br /> value of the territory proposed to with the westerly line of the afor- -
<br /> be annexed as shown by the last said 100 acre parcel conveyed to
<br /> equalized assessment roll, nor by Kate Salisbury, said westerly
<br /> public and private owners of one- line being also the westerly
<br /> half of the value of the territory boundary of the City of Pleas-
<br /> proposed to be annexed as deter- anton; thence along said westerly
<br /> mined by said legislative body; and boundary of the City of Pleas- -1
<br /> WHEREAS, said territory is con- anton South 1383.34 feet to the
<br /> tiguous to the City of Pleasanton, point of commencement.
<br /> and is uninhabited territory in the CONTAINING 53.193 acres.
<br /> County of Alameda: That the City Clerk shall per-
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, the said form all acts necessary to complete
<br /> Council of the City of Pleasanton this annexation.
<br /> does hereby approve the annexe- INTRODUCED June 9, 1958 by
<br /> tion of the territory hereinafter Councilman Cairo.
<br /> described to the City of Pleasanton, ADOPTED: June 23, /958.
<br /> and does hereby further ordain AYES: Councilmen Cairo, Bubics.
<br /> that the said territory be and is McWilliams, Orloff and Mayor
<br /> hereby annexed to the City of Pleas- Gerton.
<br /> anton. NOES: None.
<br /> That said territory the annexa- ABSENT: None.
<br /> don of which to the City of Pleas- si Bernard.T. Gerton
<br /> anton is'herein approved, is all that Mayor of the City of Pleasanton.
<br /> territory situate in the County of ATTEST:
<br /> Alameda, State of California, more s Margaret L. Conner
<br /> particularly described as follows: City Clerk.
<br /> All that certain real property Pub. June 25, 1358
<br /> ...G
<br /> I certify that the ,
<br /> is a correct copy of. . )Lt1 ;bit
<br /> passed by tile Cit? Co+:rcil of the City of
<br /> Pleasanton, Alameda County, California,
<br /> 9,c .v..,_z- �.- /ysp
<br /> Attest: g����_ ,� - t /9-5-.P
<br /> - •
<br /> ' -GAR N+ L. CONN -
<br /> to. y Clerk
<br />
|