My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 0288
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
0201 - 0300
>
ORD 0288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2017 1:12:29 PM
Creation date
2/2/2015 4:00:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/23/1958
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 0288
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I/- E IN CITY CO' NCIL OF THE CITY OF Ai7TOi] <br /> COUNTY OF AL ia,A, STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br /> ORM: ANCE NO 288 <br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF <br /> CERTAIN UNINHABITED n ITOAY, DESIGNATED <br /> "ANNEXATION NO. 9 , FAIhROUNT6 ANNEX"TO <br /> THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PIEASA TON: <br /> WHEREAS, on April 26, 1958, the Council of the City of Pleasanton did <br /> }pass and adopt Resolution No. 2759 giving notice of the proposal to annen <br /> certain uninhabited territory to the City of Pleasanton, said territory <br /> being therein deoignated as "Annexation No 9, Fairgrounds Annexe said <br /> Resolution describing the boundaries of the territory proposed to be <br /> annexed; and <br /> WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 2759 did contain a notice of the day, <br /> hour and place when and -Where the Council of the City would hear protests <br /> made by any person owning real property within the territory proposed to <br /> be annexed, the time of said hearing being not less than fifteen nor more <br /> than fifty days from the date of passage of said Resolution; and <br /> , .env„ , on June 9, 1958, et the hour of 8:00 P.M., in the Council <br /> Chambers in the City Hall of the City of Pleasanton, County of Alameda, <br /> State of California, said time end place being the day, hour and place fined <br /> in said Resolution No. 2759 for hearing protests to the said annexation, the <br /> said City Council did hear and pass upon all protests made to the proposed <br /> annexation and did determine that protests had not been made by the owners <br /> of onewhal.f of the value of the territory proposed to be annexed as shown <br /> by the last equalized assessment roll, nor by public and private owners of <br /> oneohalf of the value of the territory proposed to be annexed as determined <br /> by said legislative body; and <br /> WHEREAS, said territory is contiguous to the City of Pleasanton, and <br /> is uninhabited territory in the County of Alameda; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.