My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
121614
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:38:56 AM
Creation date
12/10/2014 4:03:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A Crowe Horwath. <br /> Mr. Steven Bocian Page 4 <br /> December 2, 2014 <br /> 3.Scope of Review <br /> Our scope of services included the following seven (7)tasks: <br /> 1. Review financial material submitted by PGS <br /> 2. Provide assistance regarding rates structures and adjustment amounts <br /> 3. Attend meeting (as requested by City) <br /> 4. Review the current rate structure for consistency with services delivered <br /> 5. Survey rates in similar service areas <br /> 6. Prepare report <br /> 7. Participate in City Council preparation and meeting (as requested by City). <br /> The City entered into a contract with Crowe on September 17, 2013 to provide these services. Crowe did <br /> not perform a financial audit, but relied on financial results presented by PGS. <br /> We submitted detailed data requests to PGS on September 12, 2014. We met with PGSs internal auditor <br /> Walt Lupeika, CPA, to discuss and clarify aspects of the data request on September 22,2014. We <br /> subsequently received a response to our data request on October 17, 2014. In most cases, PGS <br /> furnished the information we requested. <br /> 4. Rate Setting Adjustments <br /> In this section, we present our adjustments to the PGS rate application for calendar year 2015. Our <br /> adjustments are organized to generally match the organization provided in PGS's rate application. For <br /> expenses,the PGS rate application is organized consistent with the allowable expense categories <br /> contained in the Exhibit B of the Refuse Collection Agreement. <br /> Revenues <br /> PGS estimated calendar year(CY)2014 residential and commercial revenues by annualizing the actual <br /> revenue from the three months of CY 2014 actual data following implementation of the April 1, 2014 rate <br /> increase (the months of April, May, and June). PGS also estimated transfer station revenue by <br /> annualizing the actual revenue from the three months of April to June, 2014. Revenues for CY 2015 in <br /> each of these categories were held constant at their respective CY 2014 levels. We found these <br /> projections reasonable. We verified the sources of other income, including the curbside supplemental <br /> payment. <br /> Impact(s): <br /> No adjustment to CY 2015 projection. <br /> Expenses <br /> Consumer Price Index <br /> For purposes of projecting inflationary costs, as shown in Table 4, PGS used a 3.00 percent Consumer <br /> Price Index (CPI)equal to the percent change from June 2013 to June 2014 in the Bureau of Labor <br /> Statistics' Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose, CA <br /> area. We verified this calculation was correct. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.