My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
121614
>
10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:38:48 AM
Creation date
12/10/2014 11:26:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> access. She noted that there is no disabled access from the parking lot to the <br /> rear, whether or not because the Code does not require the provision of disabled <br /> access from a utility zone, but a ramp at the curb, if desired, could certainly be <br /> accomplished when the playground is constructed. <br /> 4. Increased level of noise from playground. As earlier mentioned, most <br /> Pleasanton homes are insulated and have dual-paned windows which effectively <br /> block most exterior sound; additionally, the playground will be used by limited <br /> numbers of students for limited periods of time. <br /> 5. Possibility of increased neighborhood crime activities as an place with young <br /> children is a target for child abuser. This is not really valid issue. While there are <br /> sexual predators in the world, it would not be a concern at all in a supervised <br /> environment <br /> In summary, Dr. Kenefick stated that this is not an ill-conceived unworkable and <br /> inappropriate undesirable issue to the Oakhill Shopping Center. She acknowledged <br /> that neither is it in all ways ideal, but considered in its context, it is a matter of common <br /> sense which creates a safely fence zoned for supervised recreation for the children and <br /> makes fresh air and movement part of their daily afternoon routine, encouraging focus <br /> in the classroom and promoting exercise and health. She indicated that she is not <br /> suggesting that there are no valid concerns here, but to block approval of this play area <br /> gives disproportionate weight and does these children a disservice. She added that <br /> there is or ought to be some concern for the greater good for the greater number and <br /> some acceptance of what is possible here. <br /> Faith Fisher, a Pleasanton resident for seven years, a homeowner for six years, and a <br /> YIA parent for five years, stated that her daughter was at Valley View Elementary <br /> School in a dual immersion program, and it was very helpful to have a facility like YIA <br /> nearby to support that type of program. She noted that YIA has been a valuable <br /> organization to her daughter as it has a lot of technology, and this is good for a <br /> 21st-century child. She added that the kind of mobility and activity in her child's life is <br /> also important, and so it was very encouraging that YIA was considering adding a <br /> playground to take a more holistic approach to developing both the child's mind and <br /> body. She stated that she greatly represents a number of Pleasanton residents with <br /> young elementary school-aged children and asked the Commission to consider that <br /> when making its decision. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Allen stated that her concern is the increased level of noise near the <br /> playground and asked staff what the level of noise impacts would be in a worst case <br /> scenario for residents who are outside their homes. <br /> Mr. Luchini stated that this would be going from an area at the rear of the shopping <br /> center that literally has no outdoor activity beyond the limited deliveries as mentioned <br /> earlier to an area that now has 16 children at one time for two to four hours, running <br /> around, yelling and screaming, enjoying their recreational time. <br /> EXCERPT: DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11-12-2014 Page 4 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.