Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Thorne opened the item for public comment. <br />Arne Olson commented that the unfunded pension liability has been a prevalent topic on the campaign <br />trail, noting that in one interview a point was made that the debt load may be negatively amortized over <br />the 30 year term. He suggested it would be beneficial to undertake an instructive exercise to determine, <br />based on current parameters, what time span would be appropriate to avoid negative amortization. <br />Mayor Thome closed public comment. <br />Mayor Thorne said he was asked the same question regarding negative amortization and thought it <br />might be useful to examine the cost over various time periods. <br />Ms. Wagner explains that CaIPERS ultimately makes those decisions on the city's behalf. <br />Mr. Fialho said he too was asked the same question about a 15 year amortization period. He explained <br />that the recent reform implemented by the PERS board has the primary objective of achieving 100% <br />funding at the end of 30 years, and that if PERS does not achieve its projected return on investment the <br />city's rates will increase more than the already substantial increases expected over the next 3 years. <br />He agreed it would be an interesting exercise but said that short of making additional payments as the <br />city is already doing, it would achieve little. <br />MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin /Cook - Kallio to waive full reading and adopt Resolution No. 14 -715 <br />accepting the 2013/14FY Unaudited Financial Report for the Operating Budget and amending the <br />2013/14FY Operating Budget. Motion passed by the following vote: <br />Ayes. Councilmembers Brown, Cook- Kallio, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />BREAK <br />Mayor Thorne called a brief recess and reconvened the regular meeting at 9:19 p.m. <br />14. Review and consider the City of Pleasanton's 2014 Cultural Plan <br />Community Services Manager Crose presented the staff report, stating the following purposes of the <br />Cultural Plan: to provide a realistic and visionary guide for the development and management of <br />facilities, programs and amenities for the community within the context of the General Plan; to <br />incorporate the Plan's recommendation into future City Council Work Plans; to incorporate <br />recommendations as funding becomes available into the Operating Budget, Cultural Improvement Plan, <br />and Repair and Replacement Plan; and to update the 1998 Cultural Plan per the goals stated in the <br />2011/12 City Council Work Plan. <br />She described the three phases of the project, the first of which included project initiation and the <br />formation of a 14 member steering committee and extensive review of relevant background information <br />including other city plans. Phase two involved community engagement and assessment, research and <br />a community process designed to identify the community's vision and priorities, assess needs and <br />resources and engage a broad section of the community in the planning process. This included 3 <br />steering committee meetings, 2 community Town Hall meetings, 3 focus group meetings, 23 key <br />stakeholder interviews, 1 public art workshop, an online community opinion survey, an assessment of <br />facilities and programs, and a comparison study of regional cities. Phase three included an assessment <br />and analysis of all issues that emerged during the planning process which leg to development of the <br />Plan and its recommendations. <br />City Council Minutes Page 7 of 11 October 21, 2014 <br />