My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 EXHIBIT F
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
120214
>
10 EXHIBIT F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:35:42 AM
Creation date
11/25/2014 11:21:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/2/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 EXHIBIT F
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br />DISCUSSION <br />a -f. No streams, rivers, drainage channels, etc. run through the site and, <br />therefore, the project would not alter the course of any body of water. The <br />northern portion of the site is sloped, and the proposed preliminary drainage <br />plan for the project indicates that the existing CalTrans stormwater drainage <br />system would be relocated within the project site to continue to handle the <br />runoff from the freeway. The proposed preliminary drainage plan also <br />includes a drainage system that would handle the on -site runoff for the <br />proposed development. As a portion of the site is undeveloped, the <br />proposed development would increase impervious area by approximately <br />90 %. As proposed, site drainage will be directed towards bio- retention <br />planters located in various areas of the site before draining into the City's <br />storm drain system. The project would be required to incorporate best <br />management practices (BMP's) during construction to minimize erosion and <br />stormwater pollution. The project would be required to comply with all <br />applicable stormwater runoff requirements. The project would not use a well <br />to pump ground water. The coverage of impervious surfaces on the site <br />would change with implementation of the project. However, groundwater <br />recharge would not be substantially affected because the site would <br />include stormwater management features that would allow stormwater to <br />percolate into the aquifer. Therefore, these would be Tess- than- significant <br />impacts or no- impact. <br />g-j <br />The project site is not located within the 100 -year flood zone6 and the <br />proposed project does not include any housing units. The project would not <br />impede or redirect flood flows or expose people or structures to a significant <br />risk of flooding. The project site is not in a location where the project would <br />be subject to a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Therefore, these would be no- <br />impact. <br />5.10. LAND USE PLANNING <br />ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING <br />The project site comprises vacant land, a parking lot, and a portion of a shopping <br />center. It is bordered on the west by Pleasanton Square II Shopping Center and <br />commercial uses west of Johnson Court; on the north by the 1 -580 EB Hopyard <br />Road Off -Ramp; on the east by Hopyard Road and commercial uses on the east <br />side of Hopyard Road; and on the south by Owens Drive. <br />STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if <br />the proposed project would: <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.