My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10 EXHIBIT F
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
120214
>
10 EXHIBIT F
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:35:42 AM
Creation date
11/25/2014 11:21:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/2/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10 EXHIBIT F
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br />would be limited to that required for preparation of the building foundation, <br />retaining walls near the outdoor dining area, surface parking lots, and drive aisles. <br />STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if <br />the proposed project would: <br />• Result in a project being built that will introduce geologic, soils, or seismic <br />hazards by allowing the construction of the project on such a site without <br />protection against those hazards. <br />Issues <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially Impact With Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Geoloov and Soils <br />Would the project: <br />a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial <br />adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or <br />death involving: <br />i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as <br />delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo <br />Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State <br />Geologist for the area or based on other <br />substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to <br />Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication <br />42. <br />ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? <br />Iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including <br />liquefaction? <br />iv) Landslides? <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br />c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, <br />or that would become unstable as a result of the <br />project, and potentially result in on- or off -site <br />landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction <br />or collapse? <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.