10 ATTACHMENTS 8-11 - Laserfiche WebLink

there. He added that he did want to defer to the developer that does this on a regular basis to say what works best. He indicated that he thinks they are right, but if they are wrong, there is the condition to come back. Chair O'Connor asked Mr. Tassano if the applicant is his normal first contact and not a complaint from a customer or from the realtor who is trying to get to her office, if it is normally the applicant who calls saying they have a problem or that they are too successful and have to do something about the problem. Mr. Tassano replied that he has never had an applicant call and ask him to recommend a change. He noted that a complaint is usually from someone else. Mr. Dolan stated that the community will let staff know, and staff will notice and will then work with the applicant on implementing the condition as written. He added that if staff and the applicant disagree on something, the item will come back to the Commission to resolve implementation of the condition. He indicated, however, that he is certain staff will be able to work it out with the applicant as staff has already worked on a lot of issues with them. Ms. Kerr stated that she wanted to interject on a couple of items about the trees. She indicated that she understands the Commission is looking for more trees and is concerned about shading, and they are very sensitive to that and will certainly work with staff on the sizing, getting all the balance, and putting in as many trees as they can. She pointed out, however, that they are often limited by some restrictions, often by the stormwater system, because they have to do all this pre- treatment. She added that there are some of these restrictions now for C3 stormwater regulations when they try to move water around and make it all make sense. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Allen moved to (1) find that the proposed General Plan Amendments, Zoning and Rezoning, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan and PUD Major Modification would not have a significant effect on the environment; that the General Plan Land Use Amendments are consistent with the Goals and Policies of the General Pan; and that the proposed PUD Zoning and Rezoning, Development Plan, and PUD Major Modification are consistent with the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD Ordinance; (2) make the PUD findings for the proposed Development Plan as listed in the staff report; and (3) recommend approval of the Negative Declaration prepared for the project, the General Plan Amendments (P13- 2533), the Zoning and Rezoning and the PUD Development Plan (PUD -100), and the PUD Major Modification (PUD- 96- 13- 021V1), subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in the staff report: Exhibit A -1 for the Zoning and Rezoning and the PUD Development Plan, including the modification to Condition No. 12 regarding signage and the modifications to the conditions listed in staffs memo dated October 22, 2014, and Exhibit A -2 for the PUD Major Modification, and with the modifications that EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 22, 2014 Page 11 of 12