My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14 ATTACHMENT 06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
111814
>
14 ATTACHMENT 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2015 11:29:41 AM
Creation date
11/13/2014 2:51:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
14 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
asked Mr. Weinstein if the noise analysis would show that the residents would hear the <br /> car wash at 9:55 p.m. on a hot summer day if their windows were open. <br /> Mr. Weinstein noted that 9:55 p.m. would be a really quiet time of the day, and not much <br /> goes on during Sunday evenings. He stated that the noise study would include data for <br /> the worst case scenario of ambient noise levels versus the maximum noise level that <br /> the project could generate. He indicated that the consultants went out and gathered <br /> empirical data regarding noise in this area, and what they found was that the existing <br /> minimum noise level during weekend nights was about 45 dBA, which is fairly low. He <br /> continued that the maximum noise level generated by the car wash at the nearest <br /> homes to the west across Santa Rita Road would be something like 45 dBA related to <br /> the car wash, which would not exceed the lowest noise values that exist on a Sunday <br /> night while nothing else is going on. He stated that based on that data, staff believes <br /> that the car wash would not generate perceptible noise at the nearest residences to the <br /> project site. <br /> Commissioner Allen referred to Ms. Soo's statement that there were petitions on both <br /> sides and noted that the petition submitted by the applicant was presented to customers <br /> of the Valero gas station stating that they support the proposal to convert the existing <br /> service bays to a 1,627-square-foot food store and drive-thru car wash. She further <br /> noted that nowhere in any of those petitions did she see anything about the request for <br /> the addition of alcohol sales or that this is a 7-Eleven store. She pointed out that when <br /> people signed this petition, they were not signing something supporting alcohol or a <br /> generic 7-Eleven store; they were supporting a generic food store and a car wash. He <br /> asked staff if she was reading the petitions correctly. <br /> Ms. Soo said yes. She added that she visited the site, and there is a big banner posted <br /> on the building showing the renderings of a future store. She indicated that those <br /> customers who signed the petition would have seen that banner because it is very <br /> large. <br /> Commissioner Allen asked if the banner said anything about alcohol sales. <br /> Mr. Soo replied that it did not. <br /> Commissioner Piper stated that the petition did say it would be open 24 hours. <br /> Commissioner Allen stated that the petition presented at the Planning Commission <br /> Work Session did not say 24 hours. <br /> Ms. Soo explained that the petitions circulated before the Work Session stated that it <br /> was a 24-hour operation, which was what the applicants were originally proposing then. <br /> Commissioner Allen inquired if this was at the neighborhood meeting with 10 people or <br /> so in attendance. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 27, 2014 Page 10 of 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.