14 ATTACHMENT 05 - Laserfiche WebLink

2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which the conditional uses would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Staff believes that the uses, as conditioned, would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site has adequate vehicular access from Santa Rita Road and W. Las Positas Boulevard. Additionally, the proposed project would have adequate parking for patrons and employees. To help reduce noise levels, the proposed project includes the construction of a sound barrier at the carwash exit to mitigate noise and the proposed carwash would utilize a quieter dryer system The applicant is required to provide noise specifications for the two vacuum units next to the parking stalls to ensure compliance with the Noise Ordinance. Staff has included conditions of approval that will ensure the subject use will not be operated in a manner that is detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Therefore, staff believes that this finding can be made. 3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of this chapter. The site would be rezoned to conditionally permit the subject uses. Chapter 18.124 of the Municipal Code states that, because of their unusual characteristics, conditional uses require special consideration so that they may be located properly with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. Staff finds that the recommended conditions of approval will help to integrate the proposed uses without adversely affecting the surrounding properties and the City in general. As with any use permit, this use can be revoked if the conditions are not met. As conditioned, the proposed use permit would comply with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, staff believes this finding can be made. PUBLIC NOTICE Notices regarding the proposed applications were mailed to the surrounding property owners and tenants within a 1,000 foot radius of the project site. A map showing the noticing area is attached to this report. The public notice was also published in The Valley Times. Staff has received a petition signed by 30 residents, an email from Ms. Vicki Salins on Weymouth Court, and an email from Mr. Henry Bailey at 3182 Montpelier Court, opposing the proposed project. A copy of the petition and emails is attached as Exhibit G. Staff will forward to the Planning Commission any additional public comment received after publication of the staff report. PUD-102/P14-0014 Planning Commission Page 25 of 26