14 - Laserfiche WebLink

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT An Initial Study/Negative Declaration (Attachment 7) has been prepared for the proposed project. Based on the Initial Study, staff believes that the project would not have any significant environmental impacts. Staff, therefore, believes that the Initial Study/Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental document for review of the project and is in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). If the City Council concurs with this environmental assessment, it must make the finding that the Initial Study/Negative Declaration adequately evaluates the potential environmental impacts of the project prior to taking action on the project. CONCLUSION As proposed by the applicant and conditioned by staff, staff believes that the uses will be compatible with and will not detrimentally affect the surrounding uses or properties. Conditions of approval have been included which will ensure that the safety and general welfare of the surrounding area, and the City in general, is maintained. Staff believes that the projects building and site design, as proposed and conditioned, is appropriate for the surrounding area, and conforms to the purposes of the PUD Ordinance. Submitted by: Fiscal Review: Approved �r Brian Dolan Emily Wagner Nelson Fialho Director of Community Development Director of Finance City Manager Attachments: 1. Draft City Council Ordinance with Exhibit A, Conditions of Approval for PUD-102 2. Draft City Council Resolution, Adopting the Negative Declaration 3. Draft Council Resolution with Exhibit A, Conditions of Approval for Case No. P14- 0014 (Conditional Use Permit) 4. Written Narrative and Proposed Plans, Noise Assessment Report by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. and Arborist Report by Arbor Resources 5. August 27, 2014, Planning Commission Meeting Staff Report with the Following Exhibit: Exhibit E -- Memo from Pleasanton Police Department with Calls for Service Data Exhibit J -- July 31, 2014 Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet 6. August 27, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (excerpts) 7. Initial Study and Negative Declaration 8. Petition Signed by Business Patrons Supporting the Proposed Project 9. Petition Signed by Residents Opposing the Proposed Project 10.Comparison of Gas Stations Selling Alcoholic Beverages 11.Location and Notification Maps 12.Additional Petitions from the Applicant submitted after the August 27, 2014 Planning Commission hearing (available upon request) Page 7 of 7