Laserfiche WebLink
very important to maintain the focus on continued efforts to make it through the rest of this year, which <br /> still includes several high demand months, as well as to look at potential conditions in 2015. <br /> He also acknowledged the community demand for a more long-term solution, which ultimate lies with <br /> the state. He advised that a public meeting with all Tri Valley water retailers including Zone 7 will be <br /> held at the DSRSD Board Room on August 27"' at 5 p.m. and said this is a wonderful opportunity to <br /> share concerns with Zone 7. <br /> Mr. Lowell attempted to address the issue of a moratorium on development, as has been raised by <br /> members of the public, Council and staff. He explained that a moratorium on construction is <br /> permissible, pursuant to the city's police power under the state Constitution, based upon a local water <br /> emergency. However, the city's action must be based on convincing findings that are grounded in fact. <br /> The city has currently declared a Stage 3 Water Emergency. Pursuant to its own Water Conservation <br /> Plan, the next step would be a Stage 4 Water Emergency but this does not yet appear warranted. <br /> Approximately 80% of the city's water is provided by Zone 7, who also supplies water to the cities of <br /> Dublin and Livermore. Zone 7, like the city, has declared a Stage 3 emergency but also has not <br /> proceeded to Stage 4, which makes it difficult to make a finding of emergency that would justify <br /> curtailing all new construction and uses. This is especially evident when considering that were <br /> Pleasanton to impose such a moratorium, but the cities of Dublin and Livermore did not, water would <br /> still be going to new construction and uses in those communities until Zone 7 takes action to move <br /> beyond Stage 3. <br /> Mr. Lowell stated that based on his interpretation of this information thus far, he is concerned with the <br /> city's ability to make convincing findings and feels the moratorium could be subject to a constitutional <br /> takings challenge that the city is taking private property rights without just compensation. He explained <br /> that the moratorium would have to meet the standard that it substantially advances a legitimate <br /> government interest by the least restrictive means and does not deny a property owner the <br /> economically viable use of its land. Again, this would be difficult to justify when the city's main supplier <br /> continues to provide water for new construction and uses in Dublin and Livermore. <br /> He stressed that the question of a viable moratorium is complex and likely cannot be satisfactorily <br /> answered until there is a better understanding of how Zone 7 will proceed. Despite the upcoming <br /> meeting, it is possible that Zone 7 will wait until or even after this winter before taking further action. It is <br /> also possible that should the situation become more dire, the state may promulgate emergency <br /> regulations superseding the city's and Zone 7's authority, which could allow for moratorium. At this time <br /> however, he advised that it is unlikely the Council can make legally sufficient findings to justify the <br /> imposition of a moratorium on water hookups. <br /> Vice-Mayor Pentin said it is really counterintuitive to ask the community to conserve while also <br /> continuing to issue permits. He acknowledged the City Attorney's comments but asked if it might be <br /> worth the risk to act as leaders in this regard and hope that other Zone 7 retailers will fall in line. <br /> Mr. Lowell said he doubted, based on the fact that Zone 7 is still making water available, that the <br /> findings could be made. <br /> Vice-Mayor Pentin asked what preparations the city can make now, in anticipation of the August 27'" <br /> meeting or some future action by Zone 7, to be able act quickly if a moratorium becomes feasible. <br /> Mr. Lowell advised that the city could move quite quickly if a moratorium is indeed warranted. He <br /> explained that as an emergency action, the noticing requirements are less stringent and a second <br /> reading of the ordinance is not required. Additionally, the city has the ability to call a special meeting, <br /> which can be done on 24-hours notice upon approval by the Mayor. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 7 of 11 August 19,2014 <br />