My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
090214
>
12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2015 4:56:24 PM
Creation date
8/27/2014 5:05:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/2/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Commissioner Allen thanked all the folks from a lot of different neighborhoods who took <br />the time to come out tonight and share their input because that is what the public <br />process is all about. She noted that there are a lot of faces she has never seen before, <br />and it is a pleasure to see more and more of Pleasanton's citizens participating in <br />government. <br />Commissioner Allen stated she believes that the City needs to go forward with this <br />process versus saying the City is not going to approve anything. She indicated that the <br />last thing she wants is to not follow any process and be a City where building is all done <br />by right. She noted that when a project is approved today, the City has a lot of flexibility <br />to have a developer come before the Planning Commission and the Council to make the <br />best project, given the circumstances. She pointed out that by -right means that that <br />process would not happen and developers could potentially do what they wanted. She <br />added that it may also mean that the City would not have any rights for negotiation, and <br />that would be a very irresponsible thing to do. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that she thinks there are battles to be fought later, and if <br />there are new things to learn from other cities or other places where we can continue to <br />challenge what is in place today with RHNA and our requirements, the City should <br />continue to look at them. She noted, however, that in the meantime, she did not want to <br />be a city that is by- right. She added that the City wants to maintain as much control as <br />it has, and that is really the goal. <br />Chair O'Connor agreed that the City wants to retain its control. <br />Commissioner Allen moved to that the City Council authorize the submittal of the <br />2015 -2023 Draft Housing Element to the State of California Department of <br />Housing and Community Development, with the modification that the density for <br />the CM Capital property be downzoned from 30 units per acre to 12.5 units per <br />acre as proposed by Karen Ellgas and James Paxson, and to make the <br />corresponding changes to the inventory accordingly. <br />Commissioner Piper inquired if the modification is an intention or part of the motion. <br />Commissioner Allen stated that it is part of the motion because it is a change to the <br />inventory numbers that are part of the Housing Element. <br />Commissioner Ritter noted that it would lower the 375 -unit surplus and inquired if it will <br />be higher than 175 units. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it will be 175 units because the City would not be dealing with a <br />project at this point. <br />Commissioner Ritter stated that he is a bit uncomfortable with getting rid of all the <br />surplus, although he knows that it can be added on later. <br />DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 8/13/2014 Page 17 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.