Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that the residential project that was approved by the City Council did <br /> make the requirement that it stay, but it was based on the offer by the applicant to do it. <br /> He explained that this is kind of a clean-up item and a compromise: because it would <br /> not necessarily work financially only as a residential building, so the Council agreed to <br /> allow something else to be done there so the applicant can actually fund the restoration <br /> and keep the building. <br /> Commissioner Piper commented that the building would obviously have to have <br /> significant improvements done. <br /> Mr. Dolan said that was correct and that work is ongoing. <br /> Commissioner Piper moved to find that the previously prepared EIR for the <br /> Pleasanton 2005-2025 General Plan which was certified in July 2009 and SEIR, <br /> including the adopted CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding <br /> Considerations, prepared for the Housing Element Update and Climate Action <br /> Plan General Plan Amendment and Rezoning, are adequate to serve as the <br /> environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of <br /> CEQA; to find that the proposed General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan <br /> Amendment, and PUD Rezoning are consistent with the Goals and Policies of the <br /> General Plan; and to recommend approval to the City Council of Cases P14-0419, <br /> the Rezoning, P14-0420, the Specific Plan Amendment, and P14-0421, the General <br /> Plan Amendment, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A and as <br /> shown in Exhibit C of the staff report. <br /> Commissioner Balch seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, Balch, and Piper <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> RECUSED: None <br /> ABSENT: Commissioners O'Connor and Ritter <br /> Resolution No. PC-2014-34 recommending approval of Case P14-0419, the Rezoning; <br /> Resolution No. PC-2014-35 recommending approval of Case P14-0420, the Specific Plan <br /> Amendment; and Resolution No.PC-2014-36 approving Case P14-0421, the General Plan <br /> Amendment, were entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 23, 2014 Page 2 of 2 <br />