Laserfiche WebLink
AB 1 147 Assembly Bill-Bill Analysis Page 31 of 35 <br /> the premises. <br /> According to the Authors, however, this may not be entirely true. <br /> Since the local authority for operating establishments has now been <br /> placed under the cities and county's jurisdiction there appears to <br /> be nothing that would prevent the city or county from placing <br /> specific requirements on the owner or operator of an establishment <br /> regarding its employees or independent contractors working on the <br /> premises. The only requirement under CAMTC for operators will be <br /> some education and training to receive certification from CAMTC. If <br /> for any reason a city or county found that an operator was not <br /> complying with its requirements the certification could be revoked. <br /> Again, there would be no specific requirements placed on the owner <br /> since this would be entirely under the city or county's <br /> jurisdiction. <br /> Massage California has a "Support if Amended" position on the bill and <br /> indicates that if CAMTC is to continue that they have several strong <br /> recommendations for amendments which include the following: <br /> Replace the current CAMTC and its CEO. <br /> All policies by CAMTC should be reviewed. <br /> All schools that have been "un-approved" should be <br /> re-evaluated and left to the Bureau of Private Postsecondary. <br /> Unprofessional Conduct should be clearly defined. <br /> Due process requirements for CAMTC need to be clarified. <br /> Hours of operation for establishments should be within <br /> reason. <br /> Question the need for "registering" establishments <br /> Should require immediate reporting by CAMTC. <br /> Associated Bodywork S Massage Professionals has a "Support if <br /> Amended" position on the bill and indicates that they have several <br /> major concerns which include the following: <br /> Board composition; <br /> Clarification on the purpose of the "operator" <br /> certification; <br /> Clarification on how the legislature expects CAMTC to <br /> approve schools; <br /> Clarification on the "sole provider" status; <br /> Concerns with the requested feasibility study in that it <br /> may not be objective and that CAMTC will have a self-interest <br /> in perpetuating it's role; <br /> Setting the fee ceiling at $300; a cap of $175 pertaining <br /> AB 1147 <br /> Page 42 <br /> to individual certifications would be more balanced. <br /> 1.Technical and Clarifying Authors Amendments. The Authors recommend <br /> the following technical and clarifying amendments which will be <br /> adopted by the Authors in Committee. Because of certain drafting <br /> errors on the part of Legislative Counsel, or changes that were <br /> unintended by the Authors, these amendments are necessary to <br /> properly implement the Massage Therapy Act and to assure the <br /> continued support of the League, cities and counties. <br /> (1) On page 4, line 23, after "the" strike "board" and insert: <br /> agencies . <br /> (2) On page 4, line 24, after "Affairs" strike "or a <br /> regulatory body established". <br /> (3) On page 4, line 25, strike "pursuant to this code" and <br /> insert: " or entity under the Business and Professions Code " <br /> (4) On page 4, line 30, after "500)", insert: " or entity under <br /> the Business and Professions Code " <br /> http://www.l eginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/asm/ab_1 101-1150/ab_l l47_c fa_20140620_111115_sen_comm.htm l 7/3/2014 <br />