Laserfiche WebLink
AB 1147 Assembly Bill-Bill Analysis Page 29 of 35 <br /> AB 1904 (Bonilla, 2014) , requires a certified massage therapist or <br /> certified massage practitioner to notify CAMTC of his or her primary <br /> email address, if any, and notify the CAMTC within 30 days of any <br /> change to the primary email address. ( Status AB 1904 is pending a <br /> hearing in this Committee.) <br /> 6.Prior Related Legislation. AB 294 (Negrete-McLeod, Chapter 695, <br /> Statutes of 2010) changed the sunset dates on various boards, <br /> bureaus and programs within the Department of Consumer Affairs, <br /> including CAMTC, from 2016 to 2015. <br /> AB 285 (Correa, Chapter 149, Statutes of 2011) provided that any <br /> person who provides a certificate, diploma or other document, or <br /> otherwise affirms that a person has received instruction in massage <br /> therapy, knowing that the person has not received such training, is <br /> guilty or a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of $2,500 or <br /> imprisonment in county jail for up to one year, or both. <br /> AB 1822 (Swanson, 2010) would have added two additional members to the <br /> CAMTC, each one selected by the California Police Chiefs Association <br /> and the California State Sheriffs' Association, respectively, unless <br /> those entities chose not to do so. ( Status AB 1822 was vetoed by <br /> the Governor.) <br /> 7.Arguments in Support. The League of California Cities (League) is <br /> AB 1147 <br /> Page 39 <br /> in support of this measure as it would return the tools to local <br /> governments that would allow them to close down businesses <br /> masquerading as massage establishments that are really offering <br /> illicit services, and in some cases engaging in human trafficking. <br /> According to the League, they have been very involved in this issue <br /> and have been asking for three issues to be addressed: (1) that the <br /> CAMTC be replaced with a board or commission; <br /> (2) that businesses that employ massage professionals be regulated and <br /> local governments be allowed to apply reasonable regulations to <br /> massage businesses; and (3) local governments be authorized to <br /> recoup their costs of protecting the public. The League believes <br /> that this bill addresses all of the concerns raised by the League. <br /> As stated by the League, "More importantly the bill returns land use <br /> control back to the cities and counties as well as explicitly <br /> authorizes local governments to adopt ordinances to require massage <br /> establishments to comply with reasonable health and safety <br /> requirements and abide by hours of operation. while AB 1147 does <br /> not replace CAMTC with a board or commission, it does reconstitute <br /> the CAMTC's board and adds public members as well as a position for <br /> a police chief. Finally, the bill would authorize jurisdictions to <br /> collect regulatory fees in accordance to Proposition 26 as well as <br /> pay business license taxes." <br /> The Los Angeles County Division of the League of Cities representing <br /> 86 cities, the Redwood Empire Division of the League of Cities , the <br /> Ventura Council of Governments , the San Diego County Division of the <br /> League of Cities South Bay Cities Council of Governments North <br /> County Lifeline_ and many other individual cities and counties and <br /> law enforcement are also in support for same reasons as stated <br /> above. Most also complain that under the current law pertaining to <br /> massage therapy they have experienced a substantial increase in the <br /> number of massage establishments and that these establishment are <br /> using the law to avoid oversight and regulation by local cities to <br /> operate illicit massage businesses. They indicate that by giving <br /> cities back local land use control and allowing them to enact <br /> ordinances that would require a massage establishment to obtain a <br /> license, permit or other authorization as long as the license, <br /> permit or other authorization is required of any other individual or <br /> http://www,Ieg info.ca.gov/p0/13-14/b i l I/asm/ab_1 101-1 150/ab_1147_cfa_20140620_111115_sen_comm.html 7/3/2014 <br />