Laserfiche WebLink
SB 33 (Wolk D) Infrastructure financing districts: voter approval: repeal. (Amended: <br /> 8/26/2013) <br /> Status: 9/13/2013-Failed Deadline pursuant to Rule 61(a) (14). (Last location was <br /> INACTIVE FILE on 9/11/2013) <br /> Location: 9/13/2013-A. 2 YEAR <br /> Legislative Summary: Existing law authorizes a legislative body, as defined, to create an <br /> infrastructure financing district, adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and issue bonds, <br /> for which only the district is liable, to finance specified public facilities, upon voter <br /> approval. Existing law authorizes an infrastructure financing district to fund infrastructure <br /> projects through tax increment financing, pursuant to the infrastructure financing plan <br /> and agreement of affected taxing entities, as defined. This bill would revise and recast <br /> the provisions governing infrastructure financing districts. The bill would eliminate the <br /> requirement of voter approval for creation of the district and for bond issuance, and <br /> would authorize the legislative body to create the district subject to specified <br /> procedures. The bill would instead authorize a newly created public financing authority, <br /> consisting of 5 members, 3 of whom are members of the city council or board of <br /> supervisors that established the district, and 2 of whom are members of the public, to <br /> adopt the infrastructure financing plan, subject to approval by the legislative body, and <br /> issue bonds by majority vote of the authority by resolution. The bill would authorize a <br /> public financing authority to enter into joint powers agreements with affected taxing <br /> entities with regard to nontaxing authority or powers only. The bill would authorize a <br /> district to finance specified actions and projects, and prohibit the district from providing <br /> financial assistance to a vehicle dealer or big box retailer, as defined. The bill would <br /> prohibit a district from financing any project or portion of a project within the boundaries <br /> of a former redevelopment agency until the successor agency to the former <br /> redevelopment agency has received a finding of completion. The bill would create a <br /> public accountability committee, as specified, to review the actions of the public <br /> financing authority. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. <br /> Bills to Oppose <br /> Assembly Bills <br /> AB 2188 (Muratsuchi D) Solar energy: permits. (Amended: 7/1/2014) <br /> Status: 7/1/2014-Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. <br /> Location: 7/1/2014-S. APPR. <br /> Legislative Summary: Existing law provides that it is the policy of the state to promote <br /> and encourage the use of solar energy systems, as defined, and to limit obstacles to <br /> their use. Existing law states that the implementation of consistent statewide standards <br /> to achieve timely and cost-effective installation of solar energy systems is not a <br /> municipal affair, but is instead a matter of statewide concern. Existing law requires a city <br /> or county to administratively approve applications to install solar energy systems <br /> through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit. Existing law <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />