15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Prior to any renovation, the City should evaluate each facility to determine whether such renovations or improvements have merit. Criteria may include but not limited to: current use; compare costs associated with current operations and maintenance with revenue generation; and projected growth and revenue potential post renovation Faculty Funding and Implementation Due to the overall scope of the improvements outlined in the Master Plan, it does not include specific or overall cost estimates. However, it does identify funding options which include traditional sources such as development impact fees, grants and development agreements with private developers, as well as alternative funding options including non-profit foundations, user fees, bonds, corporate sponsorships, adopt-a- park programs, special assessment districts. While the City has had significant success with financing capital expansion and renovation, the recommendations in the Master Plan will require additional prioritization and an extended time frame for the City to complete. CONCLUSION Now that it is completed, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan will provide a framework for assisting the City direct resources toward parks, facilities and programs, as well successfully addressing future community recreational needs over the next ten (10) years. Submitted by: Approved by: Susan Andrade-Wax Nelson Fialho Director of Community Services City Manager Attachment: 1. Pleasanton Parks and Recreation Master Plan (Final 4-30-14); online at http://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/pdf/PRMP-april-2014.pdf Page 9 of 9