My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
060314
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2015 12:20:27 PM
Creation date
5/27/2014 3:24:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/3/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Brown asked if it would be fair to say that the developers referred to are critically aware <br /> of the water shortage and that intensive development during a severe drought would be a definite <br /> strain. <br /> Mr. Fialho explained that it is somewhat dependent on the actual project. As an example, the project on <br /> tonight's agenda is in an area that is served by recycled water so the overall consumption is low <br /> whereas another project might not have access to recycled water but is still several years out from <br /> construction..The Council should be mindful of such considerations in evaluating any project that does <br /> come forward. <br /> Councilmember Narum asked what a target consumption goal per person would be.. <br /> Mr. Smith explained that the average consumption per person varies greatly based on the <br /> neighborhood and property type. At the outset of the 20% by 2020 plan, the citywide per capita average <br /> was about 244 gallons per day and the target goal was to get down to 195, which includes all water <br /> used in town. It is really difficult to look at a household and say what exactly their number should be. <br /> Councilrember Narum asked how much conservation the city was able to achieve in April. <br /> Mr..Smith said all city facilities exceeded the 25% reduction goal. <br /> Councilmember Narum requested confirmation that staff is making conscious decisions to keep certain <br /> assets green while letting others brown. <br /> Mr. Smith clarified that all assets will brown to a certain extent, particularly as we head in to the warmer <br /> summer months. Staff is directing a bit more water towards the Sports Park.and Val Vista, though the <br /> latter is using recycled water. Staff has also, as mentioned, planned to truck recycled water in for <br /> irrigation of the golf course with the hopes of making it through the summer without losing that rather <br /> significant asset <br /> Councilmember Narum asked if there are plans to convert the water bills to monthly versus bimonthly. <br /> Mr. Smith said they did have extensive discussions about it at the staff level but determined it was not <br /> the most feasible option both in terms of resources and the limitations of the utility's existing software. <br /> Staff has instead identified the top 20% of commercial and residential users, for whom they will perform <br /> a manual meter read each month. While these users will not be billed monthly, they will be alerted as to <br /> whether or not they are on target to achieve the mandatory reduction. The average resident can do the <br /> same by reading their own meters or requesting assistance from the city. <br /> Councilmember Cook-Kallio requested clarification on some of the prohibitions and restrictions outlined <br /> in the.PowerPoint presentation which are not necessarily reflected in the proposed ordinance. <br /> Mr. Smith explained that the slide was a summation of what is already in effect and what is proposed <br /> and that the proposed ordinance simply adds to, not supplants, actions already taken by the Council on <br /> the matter. <br /> Mayor Thome opened the pubic hearing. <br /> Alfred Exner said he agreed that this is an acute issue and questioned whether a 25% reduction is <br /> really sufficient. He noted that when Zone 7 discussed delivering 25% less water than usual, it was <br /> speaking relative to the entire year's worth of usage.. This does not account for the fact that <br /> consumption actually increased in the first part of the year to account for drier conditions. He strongly <br /> urged the Council to consider a more aggressive target either immediately or within the next 30 days. <br /> He suggested that staff continue to work towards monthly billing statements, as this will likely be a <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 20 May 6,2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.