My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
052014
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 4:35:16 PM
Creation date
5/14/2014 5:10:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/20/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUD FINDINGS <br /> Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report, pages 21-24, for a <br /> discussion of the considerations needed to approve the proposed PUD development <br /> plan. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Notice regarding the proposed project and related City Council public hearing were <br /> mailed to property owners and tenants within 1,000 feet of the subject property and was <br /> also published in the local newspaper. At the time this report was written, staff had not <br /> received any public comments in response to this notice. Two letters received in <br /> response to the Planning Commission public hearing notice have been attached to this <br /> report (Attachment 6). <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> A draft Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the proposed project. <br /> Based on an initial study, staff believes that the project-related impacts are mitigated, <br /> with the mitigation measures incorporated in the project's design or required by <br /> conditions of approval, and that there would be no significant or unmitigated <br /> environmental impacts. Staff, therefore, believes that the Mitigated Negative <br /> Declaration can be issued in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> (CEQA). If the City Council concurs with this environmental assessment, it must make <br /> the finding that the Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate prior to taking action <br /> on the project. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Workday is an important employer in the City of Pleasanton and the proposed project <br /> will allow it to grow and continue to benefit the City. The proposed office building is <br /> positioned to create a visual presence on Stoneridge Mall Road and the freeways <br /> without being too dominating. The design of the office building and parking structures <br /> are attractive and the architectural style, colors, and materials will complement the <br /> surrounding development. Affected street intersections will be mitigated to provide for <br /> efficient flow and to maintain acceptable levels of service.. Therefore, staff recommends <br /> that the Council approve the proposed project. <br /> Submitted by: Fiscal Review: Approve by: <br /> /1)4--- <br /> Brian Dolan Emily Wagner Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Community Development <br /> Page 9 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.